vivo X60 (China) vs Huawei P50E: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a reliable, if not bleeding-edge, processor, the Huawei P50E emerges as the stronger choice. Its 66W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 778G offers a balanced performance profile. However, the X60's Exynos 1080 holds potential for slightly higher peak performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X60 (China) | Huawei P50E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 29. Released 2021, January 08 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 75 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 in) | 156.5 x 73.8 x 7.9 mm (6.16 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175.6 g (6.21 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~456 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.5 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 670) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1080 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | HarmonyOS 2.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 13 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 66W wired |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4100 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Aurora, White | Galaxy Blue, Cocoa Tea Gold, Snow White, Obsidian Black |
| Models | V2046A | ABR-AL60 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 580 EUR |
vivo X60 (China)
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance with Exynos 1080
- 5nm fabrication process offers theoretical efficiency gains
- Vivo's image processing often delivers natural-looking photos
- Slower 33W charging
- Exynos 1080 may be prone to thermal throttling
- Limited 4G connectivity (China variant)
Huawei P50E
- Significantly faster 66W charging
- Snapdragon 778G offers excellent power efficiency
- More consistent sustained performance due to 6nm process
- Snapdragon 778G has lower peak CPU performance than Exynos 1080
- Huawei's software experience may be limited due to geopolitical factors
- 4G connectivity only
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like OLED type or peak brightness) are absent, both likely utilize AMOLED technology common in this price bracket. The key difference lies elsewhere. The focus here is on the internal components, not display prowess. Bezels are expected to be relatively similar, and color accuracy will likely be tuned for vibrant, consumer-friendly profiles.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature multi-camera systems, but the image processing philosophies will differ. Huawei historically emphasizes computational photography, aiming for vibrant, detailed images, sometimes at the expense of naturalism. Vivo tends towards a more balanced approach. The Snapdragon 778G’s ISP is capable, but the Exynos 1080’s ISP may offer slightly more advanced features. The absence of information on sensor sizes and lens apertures makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the focus should be on real-world image samples rather than theoretical capabilities.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X60’s Exynos 1080, fabricated on a 5nm process, theoretically offers higher peak performance due to its Cortex-A78 prime core clocked at 2.8 GHz. However, the Huawei P50E’s Snapdragon 778G 4G, built on a 6nm process, provides a more efficient architecture. The 6nm node generally translates to better thermal management, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Exynos 1080’s CPU configuration (1+3+4) is more aggressive, potentially leading to higher power consumption. The Snapdragon 778G’s Kryo 670 cores offer a more balanced approach. While the Exynos may win in benchmarks, the Snapdragon’s sustained performance could be superior.
Battery Life
The Huawei P50E’s 66W wired charging is a significant advantage over the vivo X60’s 33W charging. This translates to substantially faster top-up times, potentially reducing charging from 0-100% by nearly half. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 778G’s efficiency mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The Exynos 1080, while powerful, is less efficient, meaning the X60 may require more frequent charging despite a potentially larger battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X60 (China) if you prioritize raw CPU performance and are comfortable with potentially slower charging speeds. This phone is ideal for users who frequently engage in demanding tasks like video editing or emulation. Buy the Huawei P50E if you value fast charging, consistent performance, and a more power-efficient chipset. This is the better option for everyday users, gamers who prefer sustained performance over short bursts, and those who frequently travel.