The vivo X50 and Xiaomi Mi 10S represent compelling options in the mid-range smartphone market, but cater to slightly different priorities. The X50, with its focus on camera and design, features the Snapdragon 730. The Mi 10S, a later release, steps up the performance with the more powerful Snapdragon 870, alongside enhanced charging capabilities. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Mi 10S is the superior choice. The Snapdragon 870 delivers significantly better performance for demanding tasks and gaming, and the addition of 30W wireless charging adds convenience. While the X50 offers a sleek design, the Mi 10S’s power advantage is hard to ignore.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 16 | 2021, March 10 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) | 162.6 x 74.8 x 9 mm (6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1120 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730 (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 5 MP, AF | 20 MP, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 20 MP, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by Harman Kardon |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 56 min
30W wireless, 100% in 69 min
10W reverse wireless |
| Stand-by | Up to 570 h (2G) / Up to 420 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 17 h 50 min (2G) / Up to 8 h 20 min (3G) | - |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4780 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glaze Black, Frost Blue | Titanium Black, Ice Blue, Pearl White |
| Models | 2004 | M2102J2SC |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 430 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.52 W/kg (head) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -87.8dB / Crosstalk -87.3dB | - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 853:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 69dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 67dB | - |
vivo X50
- Sleek and stylish design (assumed based on vivo’s brand image)
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- Potentially excellent image processing for natural photos
- Significantly less powerful chipset than the Mi 10S
- Lacks wireless charging capabilities
- Limited information on display specifications
Xiaomi Mi 10S
- Powerful Snapdragon 870 processor for demanding tasks
- 33W wired, 30W wireless, and 10W reverse wireless charging
- Superior thermal management due to 7nm process
- May have a less refined design compared to the X50 (subjective)
- Potentially more aggressive image processing (depending on user preference)
- Lacks detailed display specs in provided data
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar display technologies, but detailed specs are limited for the X50. The X50’s contrast ratio of 853:1 suggests a standard IPS panel, likely prioritizing color accuracy over extreme contrast. The Mi 10S, while lacking detailed display specs in the provided data, benefits from Xiaomi’s typically vibrant and well-calibrated displays. The absence of high refresh rate information for either device suggests a standard 60Hz experience, which is common in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are marketed with camera prowess, the provided data focuses on general 'Photo/Video' capabilities. The X50 likely emphasizes image processing for natural-looking photos, a common vivo trait. The Mi 10S, leveraging the more powerful ISP of the Snapdragon 870, likely offers more advanced computational photography features. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, the 870’s superior image signal processing capabilities give the Mi 10S an edge in dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of details on OIS suggests neither phone prioritizes advanced stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Mi 10S’s Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the vivo X50’s Snapdragon 730 (8nm). The 870’s Kryo 585 cores, with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, offer a significant performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks compared to the X50’s 2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold cores. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. The 7nm process node of the 870 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during prolonged gaming sessions. The X50’s 730 is still capable for everyday tasks, but will struggle with demanding games at higher settings.
Battery Life
Both phones offer 33W wired charging, but the Mi 10S goes further with 30W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging. The Mi 10S achieves a full charge in 56 minutes via wired connection, and 69 minutes wirelessly. The X50’s charging time is not specified, but is likely slower. While battery capacity isn’t provided for either device, the Mi 10S’s charging versatility provides a significant convenience factor, especially for users who frequently use wireless charging or need to top up other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X50 if you prioritize a more refined aesthetic and a balanced experience with a focus on camera quality for everyday use. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10S if you demand higher performance for gaming, multitasking, or future-proofing, and value faster charging options including wireless capabilities.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 870 in the Mi 10S get noticeably warmer than the Snapdragon 730 during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 870 is more powerful, its 7nm process node and Xiaomi’s thermal management solutions generally result in better heat dissipation than the 8nm Snapdragon 730. You’ll likely experience sustained performance for longer periods on the Mi 10S before any significant throttling occurs.
❓ Is the 30W wireless charging on the Mi 10S significantly faster than standard wireless charging?
Yes, 30W wireless charging is considerably faster than the 10-15W wireless charging commonly found on other devices. The Mi 10S can achieve a full wireless charge in approximately 69 minutes, making it a practical alternative to wired charging.
❓ Given the lack of detailed camera specs, how do the image processing styles differ between the X50 and Mi 10S?
Vivo typically prioritizes natural-looking images with accurate color reproduction, while Xiaomi often employs more vibrant and contrast-enhanced processing. Expect the X50 to produce photos that are closer to what you see with your eyes, while the Mi 10S may offer more 'pop' and saturation.
