The vivo X50 and Realme X50 Pro 5G represent distinct approaches to the mid-range 5G market. The X50 prioritizes a sleek design and capable camera, powered by the Snapdragon 730. The X50 Pro, however, throws down the gauntlet with a flagship Snapdragon 865, aiming for near-premium performance at a more accessible price point. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which phone delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the Realme X50 Pro 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset provides a significant leap in processing power, and the 65W charging is a game-changer. However, the vivo X50 remains a compelling option for those valuing a more refined design and a balanced experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 16 | 2020, February 24. Released 2020, March 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730 (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.5, 54mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 5 MP, AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min |
| Stand-by | Up to 570 h (2G) / Up to 420 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 17 h 50 min (2G) / Up to 8 h 20 min (3G) | - |
| Type | 4200 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glaze Black, Frost Blue | Moss Green, Rust Red |
| Models | 2004 | RMX2075, RMX2071, RMX2076 |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.52 W/kg (head) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -87.8dB / Crosstalk -87.3dB | - |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 90h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 853:1 (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 69dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 67dB |
-23.2 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 592447 (v8)
GeekBench: 3175 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X50
- Sleek and stylish design
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- Capable camera system
- Snapdragon 730 is outperformed by the 865
- Slower 33W charging
Realme X50 Pro 5G
- Flagship Snapdragon 865 performance
- Blazing-fast 65W charging
- Excellent value for money
- May run hotter under sustained load
- Design may be less refined than the X50
Display Comparison
Both phones feature displays geared towards immersive content consumption, but differ in key specs. The Realme X50 Pro 5G boasts a significantly higher peak brightness of 635 nits, measured, ensuring excellent visibility outdoors, while the vivo X50’s contrast ratio is listed as 853:1 (nominal). While the X50 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio is a marketing term, the higher brightness is a tangible benefit. Details regarding panel technology (like AMOLED vs IPS) and refresh rates are missing, but both likely utilize AMOLED given the market segment. Bezels are assumed to be comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having capable photo and video capabilities, but specifics are limited. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Realme X50 Pro 5G’s flagship chipset likely provides more powerful image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is a drawback for both. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical benefit.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Realme X50 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) is a substantial upgrade over the vivo X50’s Snapdragon 730 (8nm). The 865 features a more advanced CPU architecture – a 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 prime core, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the X50’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and significantly improved gaming performance. The 7nm+ process node of the 865 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. RAM specifications are missing, but both likely offer sufficient RAM for smooth operation.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 90 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite the X50 Pro’s more powerful chipset. This is likely due to the X50 Pro’s larger battery capacity (not specified, but assumed to be larger) and efficient power management. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Realme X50 Pro 5G’s 65W wired charging, with PD support and a 35-minute 0-100% charge time, is a massive advantage over the vivo X50’s 33W charging. This difference is crucial for users who value convenience and quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X50 if you need a stylish phone with a good camera for everyday use and aren't demanding the absolute fastest performance. It's ideal for social media enthusiasts and casual gamers. Buy the Realme X50 Pro 5G if you prioritize gaming, demanding apps, and incredibly fast charging. It's the better choice for power users and those who want a phone that can keep up with their fast-paced lifestyle.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 865 in the Realme X50 Pro 5G get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 865 is a powerful chip, it can generate heat under sustained load. The Realme X50 Pro 5G likely incorporates thermal management solutions, but some throttling may occur during prolonged gaming. However, the overall performance advantage over the Snapdragon 730 in the vivo X50 will likely still be significant even with some throttling.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the vivo X50 slow compared to the 65W on the Realme X50 Pro 5G in real-world use?
Yes, the difference is substantial. The Realme X50 Pro 5G can fully charge in approximately 35 minutes, while the vivo X50 will take considerably longer. For users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly, the 65W charging is a major convenience factor.
❓ How does the image processing differ between the vivo X50 and Realme X50 Pro 5G?
Without detailed camera samples and analysis, it's difficult to say definitively. However, the Snapdragon 865's more powerful ISP in the Realme X50 Pro 5G likely allows for more sophisticated image processing, potentially resulting in better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions.
