The vivo X50 and OnePlus 8T+ 5G represent compelling options in the mid-range smartphone market, but cater to different priorities. The X50, with its focus on camera and design, now faces a strong competitor in the 8T+ 5G, which prioritizes raw performance and incredibly fast charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 8T+ 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset delivers significantly faster performance, and the 65W charging is a game-changer, reaching 100% in just 39 minutes. While the X50 offers a respectable camera, the 8T+'s overall package provides better value.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71 Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G 7.5 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 16 | 2020, October 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, October 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) | 160.7 x 74.1 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | Fluid AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730 (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 11, OxygenOS 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 5 MP, AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (market dependant) |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 39 min |
| Stand-by | Up to 570 h (2G) / Up to 420 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 17 h 50 min (2G) / Up to 8 h 20 min (3G) | - |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glaze Black, Frost Blue | Aquamarine Green, Lunar Silver |
| Models | 2004 | KB2007 |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 640 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.52 W/kg (head) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -87.8dB / Crosstalk -87.3dB | - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 853:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 69dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 67dB | - |
vivo X50
- Sleek and stylish design
- Capable camera system (details limited)
- Competitive price point
- Significantly slower processor
- Slower 33W charging
- Limited performance for demanding tasks
OnePlus 8T+ 5G
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 865 performance
- Incredibly fast 65W charging (39 minutes)
- Smooth 120Hz display
- Design may be less distinctive
- Potentially higher price
- Software bloat (typical of OnePlus)
Display Comparison
Both devices feature displays suitable for everyday use, but detailed specifications are limited for the X50. The OnePlus 8T+ 5G benefits from a higher refresh rate (120Hz, not specified for X50), resulting in smoother scrolling and animations. While the X50 boasts a contrast ratio of 853:1, the 8T+ likely offers a wider color gamut and potentially higher peak brightness, typical of OnePlus displays. Without specific nit ratings for the X50, it's difficult to assess its outdoor visibility compared to the 8T+.
Camera Comparison
The vivo X50’s camera system is a key selling point, but detailed sensor information is missing. While it likely features a capable main sensor, the OnePlus 8T+ 5G benefits from a more modern image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 865. This allows for faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. Without knowing the X50’s sensor size and aperture, it’s difficult to definitively compare image quality, but the 8T+’s superior processing power gives it an edge. We can assume both phones will have a standard set of lenses, but the 8T+’s processing will likely result in more dynamic range and detail.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The OnePlus 8T+ 5G’s Snapdragon 865 5G (7nm+) is a flagship-level chipset, featuring a Cortex-A77 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, while the vivo X50 utilizes the Snapdragon 730 (8nm). This translates to a significant advantage for the 8T+ in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The 865’s Adreno 650 GPU also far surpasses the 730’s Adreno 618. The 7nm+ process node of the 865 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions. The X50 is adequate for daily tasks, but the 8T+ offers a noticeably smoother and more responsive experience.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 8T+ 5G’s 65W SuperVOOC charging is a standout feature, fully charging the device in just 39 minutes. The vivo X50’s 33W charging is considerably slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the 8T+’s charging speed effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. Users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their phone will greatly appreciate the 8T+’s rapid charging capabilities. The 8T+’s more efficient chipset also contributes to better battery life under load.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X50 if you prioritize a sleek design and a capable camera system for everyday photography, and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the OnePlus 8T+ 5G if you demand faster performance for gaming and demanding apps, and value the convenience of incredibly rapid 65W charging. The 8T+ is the clear choice for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 730 in the vivo X50 sufficient for playing demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
While the Snapdragon 730 can run these games, you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The OnePlus 8T+ 5G’s Snapdragon 865 will provide a much smoother and more consistent gaming experience at higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 65W charging on the OnePlus 8T+ 5G compared to the 33W charging on the vivo X50 in real-world usage?
The 65W charging on the 8T+ 5G can fully charge the phone in approximately 39 minutes, while the X50’s 33W charging will take significantly longer – likely over an hour and a half. This difference is substantial for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Does the OnePlus 8T+ 5G experience overheating issues during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 865 in the 8T+ 5G is generally well-managed thermally. While some heat is expected during intense gaming, the 7nm+ process node and OnePlus’s cooling solutions help to prevent significant throttling. The X50’s Snapdragon 730 is less likely to overheat, but also offers less sustained performance.
