vivo X50 vs Honor 30 Pro+: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and a more balanced experience, the Honor 30 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its Kirin 990 5G chipset provides a significant performance uplift over the Snapdragon 730 in the X50, coupled with faster 40W wired and 27W wireless charging. However, the X50 remains a compelling option for camera-focused users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X50 | Honor 30 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 16 | 2020, April 15. Released 2020, April 21 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) | 160.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 106.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | OLED, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730 (8 nm) | Kirin 990 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G76 MP16 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 10, Magic UI 3, no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (Periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 18mm (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 5 MP, AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 1080p@1920fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K, 1080p; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 40W wired 27W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Stand-by | Up to 570 h (2G) / Up to 420 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 17 h 50 min (2G) / Up to 8 h 20 min (3G) | - |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glaze Black, Frost Blue | Titanium silver, Emerald Green, Midnight Black |
| Models | 2004 | EBG-AN10 |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 650 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.52 W/kg (head) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -87.8dB / Crosstalk -87.3dB | - |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 853:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 69dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 67dB | -23.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 510031 (v8) GeekBench: 3191 (v5.1) GFXBench: 37fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X50
- Potentially excellent camera performance (pending detailed sensor info)
- Streamlined software experience
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Less powerful Snapdragon 730 chipset
- Slower 33W charging
- Limited display brightness information
Honor 30 Pro+
- Powerful Kirin 990 5G chipset
- Faster 40W wired and 27W wireless charging
- Higher display brightness
- Potentially more complex software experience
- May run hotter under sustained load
- Higher price point (likely)
Display Comparison
The Honor 30 Pro+ boasts a measured peak brightness of 586 nits, significantly exceeding the vivo X50’s nominal contrast ratio of 853:1. While the X50’s contrast ratio suggests good black levels, the Honor’s higher brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. Both displays are listed as having an 'infinite' contrast ratio, a common marketing term that doesn't necessarily indicate superior quality. The lack of refresh rate information for the X50 puts it at a disadvantage compared to many competitors at this price point, while the Honor 30 Pro+’s display is likely to offer a smoother visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed as having strong camera capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. The absence of specifics makes a direct comparison difficult. However, the Honor 30 Pro+’s more powerful chipset likely enables more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The X50’s camera system may excel in specific scenarios, but the Kirin 990’s image signal processor (ISP) gives the Honor 30 Pro+ an edge in overall image quality and video recording capabilities. The lack of detail regarding OIS on either device makes it difficult to assess stabilization performance.
Performance
The Kirin 990 5G in the Honor 30 Pro+ represents a substantial leap in processing power over the Snapdragon 730 in the vivo X50. The Kirin 990’s octa-core configuration, with two high-performance Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.86 GHz, delivers significantly faster CPU performance. The 7nm+ manufacturing process of the Kirin 990 also contributes to improved efficiency compared to the Snapdragon 730’s 8nm node. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user experience on the Honor 30 Pro+. While the Snapdragon 730 is capable for everyday tasks, it will struggle with demanding games and applications compared to the Kirin 990.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Honor 30 Pro+ offers a significant advantage in charging speed with its 40W wired charging, 27W wireless charging, and 5W reverse wired charging. The vivo X50 is limited to 33W wired charging. This means the Honor 30 Pro+ can be fully charged much faster, and the addition of wireless charging provides added convenience. While both phones offer similar battery endurance, the Honor 30 Pro+'s charging capabilities are a clear win.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X50 if you prioritize a strong camera system and a more streamlined software experience, and are comfortable with slightly less raw processing power. It’s ideal for social media enthusiasts and casual photographers. Buy the Honor 30 Pro+ if you demand the best possible performance for gaming and multitasking, and value faster charging speeds and 5G connectivity. This phone is geared towards power users and those who want a future-proofed device.