vivo X50 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset delivers significantly more processing power, and its faster 50W charging offsets the slightly smaller battery endurance rating. However, the X50 Pro remains a viable option for those seeking a more streamlined experience and a focus on camera versatility.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X50 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 28, 77, 78 Sub6 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 01. Released 2020, June 12 | 2020, February 13. Released 2020, February 18 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 72.8 x 8 mm (6.24 x 2.87 x 0.31 in) | 162.5 x 74.8 x 9 mm (6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181.5 g (6.42 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Triple-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF, gimbal OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 108 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, 5x hybrid zoom 20 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 57% in 30 min | 50W wired, PD3.0 30W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4315 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dark Blue, Light Blue | Alpine White, Solstice Grey |
| Models | V2005A, 2006 | M2001J1G |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 930 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.34 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) | 0.69 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | Rp 5,876,500 | - |
| 256GB 8GB RAM | Rp 9,499,000 | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 88h | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.8 LUFS (Good) | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 323736 (v8) GeekBench: 1937 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 595246 (v8) GeekBench: 3331 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X50 Pro
- Sleeker, more compact design
- Potentially more refined camera software
- More affordable price point
- Less powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset
- Slower charging speeds (33W)
- Lower peak display brightness
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G
- Significantly more powerful Snapdragon 865 chipset
- Faster 50W wired and 30W wireless charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Larger and heavier design
- Potentially more aggressive thermal throttling under sustained load
- Higher initial price (though now comparable)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 858 nits measured, compared to the vivo X50 Pro’s 503 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical for AMOLED panels. While neither specification details refresh rates, the brightness difference is a key differentiator for outdoor usability. The Mi 10 Pro’s higher peak brightness makes it the better choice for users who frequently consume content outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but details are limited to 'Photo / Video' in the provided data. However, considering the market positioning, the Mi 10 Pro likely features a larger sensor and more advanced image processing capabilities. The Snapdragon 865’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more powerful than the 765G’s, enabling faster image processing and better low-light performance. While the X50 Pro likely excels in specific shooting scenarios, the Mi 10 Pro’s overall camera system is expected to be more versatile and deliver consistently higher-quality results.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo X50 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm), while the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro features the more powerful SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+). The 865’s Cortex-A77 cores (1x2.84 GHz & 3x2.42 GHz) offer a substantial performance advantage over the X50 Pro’s Kryo 475 cores (1x2.4 GHz, 1x2.2 GHz, 6x1.8 GHz). This gap is particularly noticeable in demanding applications and gaming. While both use 5G, the 865’s superior processing power allows for faster data speeds and more efficient handling of 5G networks. The Mi 10 Pro is the clear winner for power users.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro edges out the vivo X50 Pro in battery endurance, achieving 101 hours versus 88 hours. However, the real advantage lies in charging speed. The Mi 10 Pro supports 50W wired charging (with PD3.0), 30W wireless charging, and even 5W reverse wireless charging, while the X50 Pro is limited to 33W wired charging. This means the Mi 10 Pro can replenish its battery much faster, mitigating the slight difference in overall endurance. The Mi 10 Pro’s charging versatility and speed are significant advantages.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X50 Pro if you need a phone with a more compact form factor, a refined camera experience focused on versatile shooting modes, and are comfortable with a mid-range chipset. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G if you prefer raw processing power for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, faster charging speeds, and a larger display for media consumption. The Mi 10 Pro is the better choice for users who want a phone that will remain capable for years to come.