vivo X50 Pro vs. Sony Xperia 1 III: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Android Phones
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing value and a balanced experience, the vivo X50 Pro emerges as the winner. While the Sony Xperia 1 III boasts a more powerful processor and brighter display, the X50 Pro’s competitive pricing and respectable performance make it a more practical choice for daily use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X50 Pro | Sony Xperia 1 III |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA (specific) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 01. Released 2020, June 12 | 2021, April 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, August 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 72.8 x 8 mm (6.24 x 2.87 x 0.31 in) | 165 x 71 x 8.2 mm (6.50 x 2.80 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181.5 g (6.42 oz) | 186 g / 187.1 g (mmWave) (6.56 oz) |
| - | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1644 x 3840 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~643 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 98.6 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020 |
| - | Runs at 1096 x 2560 pixels except for select use cases | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.X | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF, gimbal OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.3, 70mm (telephoto), f/2.8, 105mm (telephoto), 1/2.9", dual pixel PDAF, 3x/4.4x optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 124˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.6", dual pixel PDAF 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/25/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | Native Sony Alpha camera support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 57% in 30 min | 30W wired, PD, 50% in 30 min Wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 4315 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dark Blue, Light Blue | Frosted Black, Frosted Gray, Frosted Purple |
| Models | V2005A, 2006 | XQBC62/V, XQBC52V.UKCX, SO-51B, SOG03, A101SO, XQ-BC62, XQ-BC72, XQ-BC52, XQ-BC01, XQ-BC11, XQ-BC21, XQ-BC72 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | € 505.26 / $ 903.43 |
| SAR EU | 0.34 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) | - |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | Rp 5,876,500 | - |
| 256GB 8GB RAM | Rp 9,499,000 | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 88h | Endurance rating 82h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.8 LUFS (Good) | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 323736 (v8) GeekBench: 1937 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 607423 (v8) GeekBench: 3515 (v5.1) GFXBench: 54fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X50 Pro
- Excellent value for money
- Longer battery endurance rating
- Gimbal stabilization for smoother video
- Less powerful processor
- Dimmer display
- Lacks wireless charging
Sony Xperia 1 III
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 888
- Brighter and potentially higher refresh rate display
- Advanced camera features and manual controls
- Significantly higher price
- Slightly lower battery endurance rating
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Sony Xperia 1 III’s display significantly outshines the vivo X50 Pro in terms of peak brightness, reaching 620 nits compared to the X50 Pro’s 503 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks, but the Xperia 1 III’s panel likely benefits from its higher brightness for a more dynamic range. While neither specification details refresh rate, the Xperia 1 III is known for its 120Hz display, a feature absent in the X50 Pro, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations. The Xperia 1 III’s larger size also allows for a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed as having strong camera capabilities, but their approaches differ. While both offer photo and video recording, the Xperia 1 III’s camera system is geared towards professional users, offering extensive manual controls and features like real-time tracking and 4K 120fps video recording. The X50 Pro’s camera system, while capable, is more focused on ease of use and delivering good results in a variety of conditions. Without detailed sensor size information, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison, but the Xperia 1 III’s emphasis on image quality and control suggests a more sophisticated camera experience. The X50 Pro’s gimbal stabilization is a notable feature, offering smoother video recording, but the Xperia 1 III’s advanced processing and manual controls provide greater creative flexibility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo X50 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G (7nm), while the Sony Xperia 1 III packs the more powerful SM8350 Snapdragon 888 (5nm). The 5nm process node of the Snapdragon 888 offers superior power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the 7nm Snapdragon 765G. The Xperia 1 III’s CPU configuration – a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, three Cortex-A78 cores at 2.42 GHz, and four Cortex-A55 cores at 1.80 GHz – provides a substantial performance uplift over the X50 Pro’s octa-core setup (2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver). This difference is particularly noticeable in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. Both devices feature 8GB of RAM, but the Xperia 1 III’s faster chipset and potentially faster RAM type (likely LPDDR5 vs. the X50 Pro’s LPDDR4X) contribute to a snappier overall experience.
Battery Life
The Xperia 1 III’s endurance rating of 82 hours is slightly lower than the vivo X50 Pro’s 88 hours, suggesting the X50 Pro offers marginally better battery life. However, this difference is likely offset by the Xperia 1 III’s faster 30W charging (50% in 30 minutes) compared to the X50 Pro’s 33W charging (57% in 30 minutes). The Xperia 1 III also adds wireless and reverse wireless charging capabilities, offering greater convenience. The Snapdragon 888’s improved power efficiency, despite its higher performance, helps mitigate the impact of its larger display and more demanding processing tasks on battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X50 Pro if you need a capable 5G smartphone with a good camera and long battery life without breaking the bank. It’s ideal for everyday users, social media enthusiasts, and those who appreciate a sleek design. Buy the Sony Xperia 1 III if you prioritize top-tier performance, a professional-grade camera system with extensive manual controls, and a truly immersive multimedia experience, and are willing to pay a premium for it.