vivo X50 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range and Flagship Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and a capable camera without breaking the bank, the vivo X50 Pro emerges as the winner. Its 88-hour endurance rating and competitive chipset offer excellent value. However, the Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G remains a compelling choice for those deeply invested in the Samsung ecosystem and demanding a more refined software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X50 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - SM-G986B |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - SM-G986B |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G (5+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 01. Released 2020, June 12 | 2020, February 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 72.8 x 8 mm (6.24 x 2.87 x 0.31 in) | 161.9 x 73.7 x 7.8 mm (6.37 x 2.90 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181.5 g (6.42 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M5 & 2x2.50 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - GlobalOcta-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) - USA |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Exynos 990 (7 nm+) - GlobalQualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) - USA |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Mali-G77 MP11 - GlobalAdreno 650 - USA |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF, gimbal OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.76", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (telephoto), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 1.1x optical zoom, 3x hybrid zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, f/1.0, (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS & OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.24", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio (Snapdragon model only; market/operator dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 57% in 30 min | 25W wired, PD3.0 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4315 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dark Blue, Light Blue | Cosmic Black, Cosmic Grey, Cloud Blue, Cloud White, Aura Red, Aura Blue |
| Models | V2005A, 2006 | SM-G986, SM-G986F, SM-G986F/DS, SM-G986U, SM-G986U1, SM-G9860, SM-G986B/DS, SM-G986N, SM-G986B, SM-G986W, SCG02 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | $ 174.17 / C$ 684.99 / € 299.97 |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.34 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.57 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | Rp 5,876,500 | - |
| 256GB 8GB RAM | Rp 9,499,000 | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 88h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -26.8 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 323736 (v8) GeekBench: 1937 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
vivo X50 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (88h endurance)
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful chipset than S20+
- No 120Hz display
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G
- More powerful processor (Exynos 990/Snapdragon 865)
- 120Hz display for smoother visuals
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Shorter battery life
- Potential for thermal throttling (Exynos variant)
- Higher price
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G boasts a higher-end display experience, though the vivo X50 Pro isn’t far behind. While both feature infinite (nominal) contrast ratios, the X50 Pro’s measured 503 nits max brightness is respectable, but likely falls short of the S20+'s peak brightness capabilities, which typically exceed 600 nits. Samsung’s display technology, historically, offers superior color accuracy and outdoor visibility. The S20+ also benefits from a 120Hz refresh rate, absent on the X50 Pro, resulting in smoother scrolling and animations. This difference is particularly noticeable for gamers and frequent social media users.
Camera Comparison
Both phones prioritize camera capabilities, but approach it differently. The vivo X50 Pro focuses on a versatile setup, while the S20+ aims for a more refined, all-around experience. While specific sensor details are limited for the X50 Pro, its emphasis on photo and video suggests a strong imaging pipeline. The S20+’s camera system, with its larger sensors and advanced image processing, excels in low-light conditions and offers more sophisticated video recording features. The S20+’s image processing tends towards more saturated colors, while vivo often aims for a more natural look. The presence of OIS on both devices is crucial for stable video recording and sharper low-light photos.
Performance
The chipset is where the most significant difference lies. The Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G shipped with either the Exynos 990 (globally) or the Snapdragon 865 (USA). Both are 7nm+ processors, but the Snapdragon 865 generally offers superior thermal management and sustained performance. The vivo X50 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, a 7nm chip designed for a balance of performance and efficiency. While the Snapdragon 765G is capable, the Exynos 990 or Snapdragon 865 in the S20+ provide a noticeable performance uplift in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The S20+'s CPU, with its Cortex-A76/A77 cores, offers higher clock speeds than the Kryo 475 cores in the X50 Pro, translating to faster app loading and multitasking. The S20+ also benefits from potentially faster RAM, depending on the configuration.
Battery Life
Battery life is a clear win for the vivo X50 Pro. Its impressive 88-hour endurance rating significantly surpasses what’s typically achievable with the Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G. The S20+’s 25W wired charging with PD3.0 is decent, but the X50 Pro’s 33W charging allows for a 57% charge in just 30 minutes, offering a faster top-up. The S20+ also includes 15W wireless charging and 4.5W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the X50 Pro. However, these conveniences are offset by the S20+'s lower overall battery endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X50 Pro if you need exceptional battery life, a versatile camera system, and a more affordable price point. It’s ideal for users who prioritize longevity and value. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G if you prefer a more polished software experience, a wider range of accessories, and the potential for faster performance (particularly the Snapdragon variant) – and are willing to pay a premium or accept slightly shorter battery life.