vivo X50 Pro vs Oppo Find X2 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balance of features and value, the Oppo Find X2 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset delivers significantly superior performance, and the faster 65W charging is a tangible benefit. However, the vivo X50 Pro remains a compelling option for those on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X50 Pro | Oppo Find X2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 01. Released 2020, June 12 | 2020, March 06 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 72.8 x 8 mm (6.24 x 2.87 x 0.31 in) | 165.2 x 74.4 x 8.8 mm (Ceramic) / 9.5mm (Leather) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181.5 g (6.42 oz) | 217 g (Ceramic) / 200 g (Leather) (7.05 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF, gimbal OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 129mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 57% in 30 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | 4315 mAh | Li-Po 4260 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dark Blue, Light Blue | Black, Orange, Gray, Green, Lamborghini Edition |
| Models | V2005A, 2006 | CPH2025, PDEM30, OPG01 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.34 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) | - |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | Rp 5,876,500 | - |
| 256GB 8GB RAM | Rp 9,499,000 | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 88h | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.8 LUFS (Good) | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 323736 (v8) GeekBench: 1937 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 593717 (v8) GeekBench: 13245 (v4.4), 3269 (v5.1) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X50 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Excellent battery endurance (88h)
- Capable 5G connectivity
- Less powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset
- Slower 33W charging
Oppo Find X2 Pro
- Flagship Snapdragon 865 performance
- Significantly brighter display (871 nits)
- Ultra-fast 65W charging (100% in 38 min)
- Higher price tag
- Potential for more heat under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X2 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 871 nits compared to the vivo X50 Pro’s 503 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. While both likely utilize AMOLED technology, the Find X2 Pro’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor use and HDR content consumption. The lack of refresh rate data for both phones means we can't compare smoothness, but the brightness difference is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed as having strong camera systems, but specifics are limited in the provided data. Both are described as having Photo/Video capabilities. Without sensor size or megapixel counts, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given the Find X2 Pro’s positioning as a premium flagship, it likely incorporates a more advanced camera system with larger sensors and improved image processing. The absence of details on features like optical image stabilization (OIS) or zoom capabilities makes a detailed comparison impossible, but the Find X2 Pro’s overall hardware advantage suggests a superior photographic experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo X50 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G, while the Oppo Find X2 Pro features the more powerful SM8250 Snapdragon 865. The 865’s Cortex-A77 prime core, clocked at 2.84 GHz, significantly outperforms the Kryo 475 Prime in the 765G (2.4 GHz). This difference is noticeable in demanding tasks like gaming and video rendering. The Find X2 Pro’s chipset, built on a 7nm+ process, also offers improved thermal efficiency compared to the 7nm 765G, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The 8GB of RAM in both devices is sufficient for multitasking, but the superior chipset in the Find X2 Pro will handle more intensive applications with greater ease.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both the vivo X50 Pro and Oppo Find X2 Pro achieve the same Endurance rating of 88 hours, despite differing battery capacities (not specified in the data). This suggests efficient power management on both sides. However, the Oppo Find X2 Pro’s 65W wired charging with full charge in 38 minutes is a substantial advantage over the vivo X50 Pro’s 33W charging (57% in 30 minutes). The faster charging significantly reduces downtime and provides a more convenient user experience. While battery life *endurance* is similar, the charging speed is a clear win for the Find X2 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X50 Pro if you need a capable 5G smartphone with a versatile camera system and excellent battery endurance, all while staying within a more reasonable budget. You'll appreciate its smooth performance for everyday tasks and social media. Buy the Oppo Find X2 Pro if you prioritize uncompromising performance for demanding applications like gaming and video editing, coupled with a stunningly bright display and incredibly fast charging speeds. This is the phone for power users who demand the best.