vivo X50 Pro vs OnePlus 8 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the OnePlus 8 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset delivers a noticeable performance advantage, and the 103-hour endurance rating provides superior battery life. However, the vivo X50 Pro remains a compelling option for those seeking a capable flagship at a lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X50 Pro | OnePlus 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 28, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G 7.5 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 78 SA/NSA - IN | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 01. Released 2020, June 12 | 2020, April 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, April 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 72.8 x 8 mm (6.24 x 2.87 x 0.31 in) | 165.3 x 74.4 x 8.5 mm (6.51 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181.5 g (6.42 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF, gimbal OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1/1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.4, (Color filter camera) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 57% in 30 min | 30W wired, 50% in 23 min 30W wireless, 50% in 30 min 3W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4315 mAh | Li-Po 4510 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dark Blue, Light Blue | Glacial Green, Ultramarine Blue, Onyx Black |
| Models | V2005A, 2006 | IN2023, IN2020, IN2021, IN2025 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 310 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.34 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) | - |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | Rp 5,876,500 | $ 428.39 |
| 256GB 12GB RAM | - | $ 853.51 |
| 256GB 8GB RAM | Rp 9,499,000 | - |
| RENEWED | - | $ 486.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 88h | Endurance rating 103h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.8 LUFS (Good) | -23.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 323736 (v8) GeekBench: 1937 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 573276 (v8) GeekBench: 3374 (v5.1) GFXBench: 24fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X50 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Gimbal stabilization for smoother video
- Sleek and stylish design
- Less powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset
- Shorter battery life
- Limited wireless charging options
OnePlus 8 Pro
- Superior Snapdragon 865 performance
- Longer battery life and faster charging
- Versatile charging options (wired, wireless, reverse wireless)
- Higher price
- Potentially larger and heavier design
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both the vivo X50 Pro and OnePlus 8 Pro feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, indicating excellent black levels. However, the OnePlus 8 Pro likely benefits from a higher peak brightness, though specific measurements are unavailable. The X50 Pro’s measured 503 nits is respectable, but the OnePlus 8 Pro, given its flagship positioning, likely exceeds this. Both utilize smooth display technology, though refresh rate specifics aren't provided. The OnePlus 8 Pro’s larger size and potentially higher brightness make it the better choice for outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed as having strong camera systems, but details are limited to 'Photo / Video' capabilities. The OnePlus 8 Pro likely benefits from a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Snapdragon 865, leading to better image processing. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given OnePlus’s history of focusing on camera quality, the 8 Pro likely offers a more refined and versatile camera experience. The X50 Pro’s gimbal stabilization is a notable feature, but its impact is difficult to quantify without direct comparison.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 8 Pro’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) significantly outperforms the vivo X50 Pro’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm). The 865 features a more powerful Cortex-A77 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz versus the X50 Pro’s 2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The OnePlus 8 Pro’s 12GB RAM option (vs. 8GB on both models) further enhances multitasking capabilities. While the 765G is capable, the 865 offers a substantial leap in processing power, especially for graphically intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 8 Pro boasts a superior endurance rating of 103 hours compared to the vivo X50 Pro’s 88 hours. This suggests more efficient power management or a larger battery capacity (not specified). While both support fast charging, the OnePlus 8 Pro offers more versatile options: 30W wired (50% in 23 minutes), 30W wireless (50% in 30 minutes), and 3W reverse wireless charging. The X50 Pro’s 33W wired charging (57% in 30 minutes) is competitive, but lacks wireless charging options.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X50 Pro if you need a well-rounded flagship experience with a focus on camera versatility and are comfortable with slightly less processing power. It’s ideal for everyday users, social media enthusiasts, and those who appreciate a more affordable price. Buy the OnePlus 8 Pro if you prioritize peak performance for gaming, demanding applications, and want the longest possible battery life. It’s the better choice for power users, mobile gamers, and those who want a phone that will remain fast and responsive for years to come.