vivo X50 Pro vs. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and long-term software support, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is the superior choice. Its A14 Bionic chip and optimized iOS ecosystem deliver a smoother, more responsive experience. However, the vivo X50 Pro offers compelling value and faster charging for those seeking a capable Android flagship.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X50 Pro | Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - A2342 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79, 260, 261 Sub6/mmWave - A2342 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 Sub6 - A2410, A2411, A2412 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 01. Released 2020, June 12 | 2020, October 13 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, November 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, stainless steel frame |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 72.8 x 8 mm (6.24 x 2.87 x 0.31 in) | 160.8 x 78.1 x 7.4 mm (6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (China) |
| Weight | 181.5 g (6.42 oz) | 228 g (8.04 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 6m for 30 min) Apple Pay (Visa, MasterCard, AMEX certified) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Ceramic Shield glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1284 x 2778 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~458 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | Super Retina XDR OLED, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 800 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Hexa-core (2x3.1 GHz Firestorm + 4x1.8 GHz Icestorm) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Apple GPU (4-core graphics) |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | iOS 14.1, upgradable to iOS 26.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 512GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | NVMe | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama) |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF, gimbal OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/1.9", 1.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 65mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.4, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.4", 1.0µm TOF 3D LiDAR scanner (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, 10‑bit HDR, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 60fps), stereo sound rec. |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 12 MP, f/2.2, 23mm (wide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm SL 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | Lightning, USB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, hotspot |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Virtual proximity sensing | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 57% in 30 min | Wired, PD2.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless (MagSafe) 15W wireless (Qi2) - requires iOS 17.4 update |
| Type | 4315 mAh | Li-Ion 3687 mAh (14.13 Wh) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dark Blue, Light Blue | Silver, Graphite, Gold, Pacific Blue |
| Models | V2005A, 2006 | A2411, A2342, A2410, A2412, iPhone13,4 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | $ 328.00 / C$ 549.75 / £ 270.67 / € 339.00 |
| SAR EU | 0.34 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | $ 599.99 |
| 128GB 8GB RAM | Rp 5,876,500 | - |
| 256GB 6GB RAM | - | $ 728.45 |
| 256GB 8GB RAM | Rp 9,499,000 | - |
| 512GB 6GB RAM | - | $ 886.67 |
| RENEWED | - | $ 627.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 88h | Endurance rating 95h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.8 LUFS (Good) | -23.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 323736 (v8) GeekBench: 1937 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 638584 (v8) GeekBench: 4240 (v5.1) GFXBench: 55fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X50 Pro
- Faster wired charging (33W)
- More affordable price point
- Gimbal stabilization for smooth video
- Less powerful processor (Snapdragon 765G)
- Shorter software support lifespan
- Lower peak display brightness
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
- Industry-leading performance (A14 Bionic)
- Superior camera image processing
- Long-term software support (iOS)
- Higher price
- Slower wired charging (compared to X50 Pro)
- Less flexible software customization
Display Comparison
Both devices feature 'Infinite' contrast ratios, typical of OLED panels. However, the iPhone 12 Pro Max boasts a significantly higher peak brightness of 822 nits compared to the vivo X50 Pro’s 503 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both offer excellent color reproduction, the iPhone’s display is known for its color accuracy, crucial for professional photo and video editing. The X50 Pro’s display, while still excellent, doesn’t reach the same level of outdoor readability.
Camera Comparison
Both phones excel in photography, but approach it differently. While detailed sensor specs are missing for the X50 Pro, its reputation centers around its gimbal stabilization system, providing exceptionally smooth video recording. The iPhone 12 Pro Max, with its larger sensors and advanced computational photography, delivers consistently excellent image quality in various conditions. Apple’s Deep Fusion and Smart HDR algorithms enhance detail and dynamic range. The iPhone’s video capabilities, particularly in ProRes format (available on later models), are a significant advantage for professional videographers. The X50 Pro’s camera is strong, but the iPhone’s image processing and overall consistency give it an edge.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. Apple’s A14 Bionic, fabricated on a 5nm process, demonstrably outperforms the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7nm) in the vivo X50 Pro. The A14’s hexa-core architecture, with its 3.1 GHz Firestorm cores, provides a substantial performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. While the Snapdragon 765G is a capable mid-range processor, it cannot match the A14’s sustained performance or efficiency. The iPhone 12 Pro Max also benefits from 6GB of RAM, while the X50 Pro has 8GB, but the iOS memory management is more efficient, mitigating the RAM difference.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of approximately 95 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The vivo X50 Pro supports 33W wired charging, achieving 57% charge in 30 minutes. The iPhone 12 Pro Max, while supporting faster charging via Power Delivery (PD 2.0), only reaches 50% in 30 minutes. The iPhone also offers 15W wireless charging with MagSafe and Qi2 (with iOS 17.4), a convenience the X50 Pro lacks. The similar endurance ratings suggest that despite the different charging speeds, both phones can comfortably last a full day of moderate use.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X50 Pro if you need a versatile camera system with excellent low-light performance and prioritize fast 33W charging, all within a more affordable price range. Buy the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max if you prefer a seamless user experience, industry-leading performance, and a robust ecosystem with guaranteed software updates, even if it means paying a premium.