vivo X50 Lite vs OnePlus Nord 5: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing smooth performance and future-proofing, the OnePlus Nord 5 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 offers a substantial leap in processing power and efficiency, coupled with incredibly fast 80W charging. However, budget-conscious users on light tasks will find the X50 Lite perfectly adequate.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X50 Lite | OnePlus Nord 5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 12. Released 2020, May 12 | 2025, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, July 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.3 x 75.2 x 8.7 mm (6.27 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) | 163.4 x 77 x 8.1 mm (6.43 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190.2 g (6.70 oz) | 211 g (7.44 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) | 1272 x 2800 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 99.9 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.83 inches, 113.3 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Swift AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1400 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10 | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Ultra HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD, 100% in just 54 min 5W reverse wired Bypass charging |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Market-dependent versions:· 5200 mAh (Europe)· 6800 mAh (Global) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Nebula Blue, Jade Black | Phantom Grey, Dry Ice, Marble Sands |
| Models | V1937, 1937 | CPH2709 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | £ 339.00 / € 294.97 / ₹ 31,998 |
| SAR | - | 1.18 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 49:12h endurance, 1200 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class C (90 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class B |
vivo X50 Lite
- More affordable price point
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks
- Established brand reputation
- Significantly slower performance
- Slower charging speed
- Likely inferior display quality
OnePlus Nord 5
- Exceptional performance with Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
- Ultra-fast 80W charging
- Bright and vibrant display (1330 nits)
- Higher price tag
- May be overkill for basic users
- Potential for more heat generation under sustained load (though mitigated by 4nm process)
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 5 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1330 nits, compared to the X50 Lite’s unspecified brightness. This higher peak brightness will dramatically improve visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the X50 Lite’s display specs are not provided, it’s likely a standard LCD panel, whereas the Nord 5’s brightness suggests a more advanced AMOLED technology. The Nord 5’s superior brightness is a key advantage for media consumption and outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the X50 Lite, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Nord 5’s chipset benefits image processing capabilities. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) will deliver faster image capture, improved noise reduction, and better dynamic range. While the X50 Lite likely features a standard camera setup, the Nord 5’s processing power allows for more sophisticated computational photography features. The absence of sensor details for the X50 Lite makes it difficult to assess its low-light performance relative to the Nord 5.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The vivo X50 Lite’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11nm) is a capable chip for basic tasks, featuring an octa-core CPU with Kryo 260 cores. However, the OnePlus Nord 5’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) is in a different league. The 4nm process node delivers significantly improved power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing for sustained peak performance. The Nord 5’s CPU configuration – a Cortex-X4 prime core alongside A720 and A520 cores – provides a much more responsive and fluid experience, especially in demanding applications and games. The Nord 5 will handle multitasking and graphically intensive games with ease, while the X50 Lite may struggle.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Nord 5’s battery endurance is a standout feature, offering 49:12 hours of total usage and 13:47 hours of active use. This is coupled with incredibly fast 80W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 54 minutes. The X50 Lite’s 18W charging is significantly slower. While the Nord 5’s battery capacity isn’t explicitly stated, the endurance score suggests a well-optimized battery system. The Nord 5 also includes 33W PPS and 18W PD charging standards, alongside 5W reverse wired charging, offering versatility. The X50 Lite’s slower charging speed will require longer periods plugged into the wall.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X50 Lite if you need a reliable, affordable smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, social media, and light browsing. It's ideal for users who don't demand high-end gaming or intensive multitasking. Buy the OnePlus Nord 5 if you prioritize a responsive user experience, demanding mobile gaming, and rapid charging – it’s for those who want a phone that can keep up with a fast-paced lifestyle and offers longevity.