vivo X50 Lite vs. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025): A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset delivers a substantial performance uplift over the X50 Lite’s Snapdragon 665, and the 68W charging and 1870 nit display provide a modern user experience that the X50 Lite simply can’t match.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X50 Lite | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 12. Released 2020, May 12 | 2025, April 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, April 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.3 x 75.2 x 8.7 mm (6.27 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) | 162.2 x 74.8 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 190.2 g (6.70 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~444 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 99.9 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10 | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Nebula Blue, Jade Black | Pantone: Gibraltar sea, Surf the Web |
| Models | V1937, 1937 | XT2517-1 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | $ 299.99 / C$ 368.17 |
vivo X50 Lite
- Potentially lower price point
- Familiar Android experience
- Lightweight design (assumed)
- Outdated Snapdragon 665 chipset
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely dimmer display
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)
- Powerful Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset
- Ultra-fast 68W wired and 15W wireless charging
- Bright 1870 nit display
- Long battery life (10:05h active use)
- Higher initial cost
- Larger size (likely)
- Stylus may not be useful for all users
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1870 nits. This is a massive improvement over what we’d expect from the X50 Lite, making it far more usable outdoors in direct sunlight. While the X50 Lite’s display specs aren’t publicly available, it’s unlikely to approach this level of brightness. The Moto G Stylus 5G’s brightness isn’t just about visibility; it also contributes to a more vivid and engaging viewing experience. We can assume the X50 Lite uses an LCD panel, while the Moto G Stylus 5G likely uses an IPS LCD, but the brightness difference is the key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the vivo X50 Lite, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) likely benefits from the improved image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3. While neither phone is expected to compete with flagship camera systems, the newer chipset will likely deliver better dynamic range and noise reduction. The X50 Lite’s camera performance will likely be adequate for casual photography, but the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) should offer a more refined and versatile camera experience. We can assume both phones will include a standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially macro lenses, but sensor size and aperture will be key factors.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) utilizes the Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm), featuring a Cortex-A78 based CPU core configuration. This is a significant leap forward from the vivo X50 Lite’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling, meaning sustained performance is higher. The Cortex-A78 cores in the Moto G Stylus 5G offer a noticeable performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks compared to the Kryo 260 Gold cores in the X50 Lite. The newer chipset also benefits from a more modern GPU, resulting in smoother gaming and faster graphics rendering.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) excels in charging speed, supporting 68W wired charging and 15W wireless charging. This allows for a significantly faster recharge time compared to the X50 Lite’s 18W wired charging. While the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) achieves an impressive 10:05h active use score, the X50 Lite’s battery capacity is unknown. However, the faster charging of the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) mitigates any potential disadvantage in battery capacity, providing users with more uptime and less downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X50 Lite if you prioritize a lower initial cost and are comfortable with a less powerful processor and slower charging. It’s a viable option for basic smartphone tasks. Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) if you value performance, a vibrant display, and incredibly fast charging – features that will significantly enhance your daily smartphone experience, especially if you frequently use demanding apps or consume a lot of media.