Both the Vivo X50 5G and Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly crowded mid-range 5G smartphone market. Released around the same time, they both leverage the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, but diverge in areas like display brightness, charging speed, and pricing, creating a genuine decision point for budget-conscious consumers seeking 5G connectivity.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a slightly brighter display, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G offers a compelling package. However, the Vivo X50 5G’s potentially more refined camera experience and brand reputation make it a strong contender, especially for photography enthusiasts.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 7, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 01. Released 2020, June 06 | 2020, March 27. Released 2020, May 25 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) | 163.7 x 74.8 x 7.9 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 174.5 g (6.17 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 20W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glaze Black, Frost Blue, Pink | Aurora Blue, Cosmic Gray, Dream White |
| Models | V2001A, 2005 | M2002J9G, M2002J9S, XIG01 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 130 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.74 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | £ 312.99 |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | - | £ 399.99 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 272.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 103h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318117 (v8)
GeekBench: 1927 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X50 5G
- Potential for superior video stabilization with gimbal system
- Strong brand reputation for camera technology
- Faster 33W charging
- Display brightness is likely lower than the Mi 10 Lite 5G
- Charging standards not explicitly listed (PD/QC support)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
- Brighter 610 nit display for better outdoor visibility
- Faster charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support
- More affordable pricing options (especially the 64GB model)
- Lacks the gimbal stabilization found in the Vivo X50 5G
- Camera performance may not match the Vivo in video recording
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 610 nits, a significant advantage over the unlisted brightness of the Vivo X50 5G, making it more usable in direct sunlight. Both phones feature an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED panels. While neither specifies refresh rates beyond standard 60Hz, the Mi 10 Lite’s higher brightness is a tangible benefit for outdoor use and HDR content consumption. The lack of detailed display specs for the X50 5G leaves the Mi 10 Lite as the clear winner in this category.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. The Vivo X50 5G is known for its gimbal stabilization system, a feature absent in the Mi 10 Lite 5G. This suggests a potential advantage for video recording on the Vivo, offering smoother footage. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a camera winner, but the X50 5G’s gimbal system gives it a likely edge in video quality and stability. The Mi 10 Lite's camera is likely more than adequate for everyday photography, but lacks the specialized hardware of the Vivo.
Performance
Both the Vivo X50 5G and Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G are powered by the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) chipset, featuring the same octa-core CPU configuration (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver). This means CPU performance will be virtually identical. The real-world difference will likely come down to thermal management and RAM speed, which are not specified for either device. However, given the similar hardware, sustained performance under load should be comparable, making this a tie in terms of raw processing power.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G offers 20W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support, while the Vivo X50 5G charges at 33W. This faster charging speed translates to quicker top-ups. Both phones share an endurance rating of 103 hours, suggesting similar battery life despite potentially different capacities (not specified). The Mi 10 Lite’s support for Power Delivery and Quick Charge standards also offers greater compatibility with a wider range of chargers. The faster charging of the Vivo is offset by the Mi 10 Lite's broader charging compatibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Vivo X50 5G if you prioritize a potentially more polished camera system and value a brand known for its imaging capabilities. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G if you prefer faster charging speeds, a brighter screen for outdoor visibility, and are seeking the best possible value for your money, particularly given the price difference between the 128GB and 64GB models.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 765G in either phone struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 765G is a capable mid-range chipset, but demanding games may require reduced graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. Both phones should be able to run PUBG and Call of Duty, but expect to adjust settings to balance visual fidelity and frame rates. Thermal throttling could also become a factor during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Is the 64GB storage option on the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G sufficient for most users?
64GB of storage can be limiting, especially with the increasing size of apps and media. If you plan to take a lot of photos and videos, or download many apps, we strongly recommend opting for the 128GB model. The price difference is worth the extra storage for most users.
❓ How does the camera perform in low-light conditions on each device?
Without detailed camera specs, it's difficult to definitively say. However, the Vivo X50 5G's gimbal system may provide an advantage in low-light video recording by reducing shake. For still photos, larger sensors and wider apertures generally perform better in low light, but this information isn't available for either phone.
