vivo X50 5G vs Realme X50 Pro 5G: Which 5G Phone Delivers the Best Value?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme X50 Pro 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset delivers significantly faster performance, and the 65W SuperDart charging is a game-changer. While the X50 5G offers a respectable experience, the Pro model’s power advantage justifies the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X50 5G | Realme X50 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 01. Released 2020, June 06 | 2020, February 24. Released 2020, March 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 174.5 g (6.17 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.5, 54mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | 4200 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glaze Black, Frost Blue, Pink | Moss Green, Rust Red |
| Models | V2001A, 2005 | RMX2075, RMX2071, RMX2076 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 90h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 592447 (v8) GeekBench: 3175 (v5.1) GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X50 5G
- Gimbal stabilization for smoother video recording
- Potentially more refined software experience (vivo's Funtouch OS)
- More affordable price point
- Significantly slower processor than the X50 Pro
- Slower charging speeds (33W vs 65W)
- Display isn't as bright
Realme X50 Pro 5G
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 865
- Incredibly fast 65W SuperDart charging
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Lacks gimbal stabilization found in the X50 5G
- Potentially more aggressive software (Realme UI)
- May run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Realme X50 Pro 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 635 nits, compared to the X50 5G (brightness unspecified). While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the higher peak brightness of the X50 Pro translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'infinite' contrast ratio, typical of LCD technology, meaning blacks won't be as deep as on OLED panels. Bezels are comparable, but the brighter screen gives the X50 Pro a slight edge for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but details are limited to 'Photo / Video' for both. However, the X50 5G is known for its gimbal stabilization system, a feature absent on the X50 Pro. This suggests a focus on video recording quality and stability. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the X50 5G’s gimbal system likely provides a smoother video experience. The X50 Pro’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 865 could offer better image processing in challenging conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme X50 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) is a substantial upgrade over the vivo X50 5G’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm). The 865 features a newer Cortex-A77 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, versus the 765G’s Kryo 475 Prime at 2.4 GHz. This, combined with a more powerful Adreno 650 GPU, results in significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The 765G is capable, but the 865 offers a future-proofed experience. Both phones support 5G connectivity, but the 865’s modem offers potentially faster speeds and broader network compatibility.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 90 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the X50 Pro’s more power-hungry chipset. This is likely due to optimizations in software and battery management. However, the X50 Pro’s 65W SuperDart charging is a massive advantage, achieving a 100% charge in just 35 minutes. The X50 5G’s 33W charging is considerably slower. This difference in charging speed significantly impacts usability, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X50 5G if you prioritize a more balanced package with a focus on camera versatility and a slightly more refined software experience, and are comfortable with a mid-range processor. Buy the Realme X50 Pro 5G if you demand the fastest possible performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value incredibly fast charging speeds above all else.