vivo X50 5G vs Huawei nova 7 5G: Which 5G Mid-Ranger Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a well-rounded experience, the Huawei nova 7 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Kirin 985 chipset offers a slight edge in CPU performance, coupled with significantly faster 40W charging, making it ideal for power users and those on the go.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X50 5G | Huawei nova 7 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 01. Released 2020, June 06 | 2020, April 23. Released 2020, April 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) | 160.6 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 174.5 g (6.17 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | OLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.58 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x2.40 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.84 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Kirin 985 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Mali-G77 (8-core) |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 10, EMUI 10.1, no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.4, 17mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K, 1080p, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 40W wired, 75% in 30 min 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glaze Black, Frost Blue, Pink | Black, Space Silver, Midsummer Purple, Red, Green |
| Models | V2001A, 2005 | JEF-TN00, JEF-AN00, JEF-NX9, JEF-AN20 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 390 EUR |
vivo X50 5G
- Guaranteed Google Mobile Services access
- Qualcomm’s optimized 5G modem
- Potentially more efficient processor
- Slower 33W charging
- Slightly less powerful CPU
- Software updates may be less frequent
Huawei nova 7 5G
- Faster 40W charging with 75% in 30 minutes
- Potentially more powerful Kirin 985 chipset
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Potential GMS restrictions and reliance on AppGallery
- Software update uncertainty
- May run warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
Neither vivo nor Huawei provided display specs beyond the devices themselves. However, both likely utilize AMOLED panels given the market segment. The key difference lies in processing power needed to drive the display, which is tied to the chipset. While both are 7nm, the Kirin 985’s CPU architecture may offer a slight advantage in display rendering. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of mid-range devices. Color accuracy will likely be good on both, but independent testing is needed to confirm.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are missing, but both phones are marketed with a focus on photography. The image processing philosophies will likely differ – vivo typically aims for vibrant, social media-ready images, while Huawei often leans towards more natural color reproduction. The Kirin 985’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is likely more advanced, potentially offering better noise reduction and dynamic range. Without sensor size information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Kirin 985’s processing capabilities give the nova 7 5G a potential advantage. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the main sensor of either device would be a significant benefit, but is unconfirmed.
Performance
The core battleground is the chipset. The Huawei nova 7 5G’s Kirin 985, with its 2.58 GHz Cortex-A76 core, boasts a higher clock speed than the vivo X50 5G’s Snapdragon 765G’s 2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime. The Kirin 985 also features a tri-core A76 setup, potentially offering better multi-core performance. While the Snapdragon 765G benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized software and modem integration, the Kirin 985’s raw CPU power gives it an edge in benchmarks. Both utilize 7nm fabrication, but the architectural differences favor Huawei. The Snapdragon 765G’s Adreno 620 GPU is a capable performer, but the Kirin 985’s Mali-G77 MP6 GPU is likely to deliver slightly better graphics performance. RAM speed is not specified, but both likely use LPDDR4X, limiting the performance gap.
Battery Life
The Huawei nova 7 5G’s 40W wired charging is a clear advantage over the vivo X50 5G’s 33W charging. Huawei claims 75% charge in 30 minutes, a substantial time saving. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The nova 7 5G also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories. The Snapdragon 765G is generally more power-efficient, potentially offsetting the charging difference slightly, but the nova 7 5G’s faster charging is a more impactful real-world benefit.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X50 5G if you prioritize a more established software ecosystem with guaranteed Google Mobile Services and a focus on camera versatility. Buy the Huawei nova 7 5G if you prefer a potentially more powerful processor for demanding tasks, faster charging speeds, and don't mind the limitations of Huawei's AppGallery and potential GMS restrictions.