vivo X300 vs Xiaomi 14 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi 14 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, coupled with 120W wired charging, offers a more consistently powerful experience. However, the vivo X300’s impressive 52:15h battery endurance is a strong contender for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X300 | Xiaomi 14 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 13 | 2023, October 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 17 | Available. Released 2023, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front, aluminum frame or titanium frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 150.6 x 71.9 x 8 mm (5.93 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) | 161.4 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - China | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 223 g or 230 g (7.87 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Reinforced Glass, Mohs level 4 | Shatterproof glass |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.31 inches, 98.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra & 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium & 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Arm G1-Ultra | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 16, up to 5 major Android upgrades, OriginOS 6 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, 4K@120fps HDR | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired 40W wireless Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless, 100% in 40 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | · Si/C Li-Ion 6040 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5360 mAh (EU markets) | Li-Po 4880 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Phantom Black, Mist Blue, Summit Red, Iris Purple, Halo Pink | Black, Silver, Titanium, Green |
| Models | V2515, V2509A | 23116PN5BC |
| Price | About 1100 EUR | About 650 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 52:15h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
vivo X300
- Exceptional battery endurance (52:15h)
- Efficient 3nm Dimensity 9500 chipset
- High peak display brightness (1930 nits)
- Long-lasting battery health (1200 cycles)
- Slower charging speeds compared to Xiaomi 14 Pro
- Potential software optimization lag compared to Qualcomm
Xiaomi 14 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging (18 min to 100%)
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset
- Established Qualcomm software ecosystem
- Faster wireless charging (50W)
- Likely shorter battery life compared to vivo X300
- Potential for more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 14 Pro and vivo X300 both feature premium displays, but the X300 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1930 nits, suggesting a potentially more visible screen in direct sunlight. While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates (based on flagship standards), the X300’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor visibility. Details regarding panel type (AMOLED vs. other) and color accuracy are missing, but both are expected to deliver vibrant and accurate visuals.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, both phones are expected to feature advanced camera systems. The Xiaomi 14 Pro, given Xiaomi’s history, likely prioritizes large sensor sizes and computational photography. The X300 may focus on color science and image processing tailored to the Mediatek chipset. The absence of information on sensor resolution, aperture, and optical image stabilization (OIS) makes a definitive judgment impossible, but both are expected to deliver flagship-level image quality.
Performance
The core battle lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 14 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is a proven performer, utilizing a Cortex-X4 prime core for peak tasks. The vivo X300’s Dimensity 9500 (3nm) aims to leapfrog Qualcomm with a more efficient node and a unique core configuration – a 1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra, 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium, and 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro. The 3nm process *should* translate to better thermal efficiency for the X300, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming. However, Qualcomm’s optimizations and the Snapdragon’s established ecosystem give the 14 Pro an edge in sustained performance and software compatibility. The 14 Pro's CPU architecture, with its Cortex-X4, is designed for higher single-core performance, crucial for responsive UI and app loading.
Battery Life
The vivo X300’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, rated at 52:15 hours. This is significantly higher than typical flagship endurance. While the Xiaomi 14 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its 120W wired charging (100% in 18 minutes) is substantially faster than the X300’s 90W charging. The 14 Pro also offers 50W wireless charging (100% in 40 minutes) compared to the X300’s 40W. The X300’s 1200 charge cycles suggest a focus on long-term battery health, while the 14 Pro prioritizes speed and convenience. The X300’s active use score of 17:31h further reinforces its battery prowess.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X300 if you prioritize exceptional battery life and value a balanced, efficient chipset. It’s ideal for users who frequently travel or rely heavily on their phone throughout the day. Buy the Xiaomi 14 Pro if you demand the absolute fastest performance, quickest charging speeds, and a more robust software ecosystem, even if it means slightly shorter battery life.