vivo X300 vs Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and rapid charging, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers a more mature software ecosystem and faster charging speeds. However, the vivo X300’s exceptional battery endurance and potentially lower price make it a compelling alternative.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X300 | Oppo Find X7 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 13 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 17 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 150.6 x 71.9 x 8 mm (5.93 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) | 164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - China | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Reinforced Glass, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.31 inches, 98.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra & 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium & 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Arm G1-Ultra | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 16, up to 5 major Android upgrades, OriginOS 6 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, 4K@120fps HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired 40W wireless Reverse wired | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | · Si/C Li-Ion 6040 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5360 mAh (EU markets) | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Phantom Black, Mist Blue, Summit Red, Iris Purple, Halo Pink | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown |
| Models | V2515, V2509A | PHY110, PHY120 |
| Price | About 1100 EUR | $ 546.64 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 52:15h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
vivo X300
- Exceptional battery life (52:15h endurance)
- Brighter display (1930 nits)
- Potentially more power-efficient chipset (3nm Dimensity 9500)
- MediaTek chipset may have less software optimization
- Slower charging speed (90W)
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
- Proven Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance
- Faster charging (100W, 0-100% in 26 minutes)
- Mature software ecosystem
- Shorter battery life (12:47h active use)
- Less bright display (1165 nits)
Display Comparison
The vivo X300 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1930 nits compared to the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s 1165 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely employ high-refresh-rate panels, the X300’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor users. The lack of specific panel technology details (LTPO, AMOLED) prevents a deeper analysis, but the X300’s brightness is a quantifiable advantage.
Camera Comparison
Without camera specifications, a detailed comparison is limited. However, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra, given its 'Ultra' branding, likely prioritizes camera capabilities. The Snapdragon’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally regarded as highly capable. The vivo X300’s camera performance will depend on sensor size and image processing algorithms, which are currently unknown. We can assume both phones will offer a multi-camera system, but the X7 Ultra is likely to have a more advanced setup.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is a proven performer, utilizing a 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core. The vivo X300’s Dimensity 9500 (3nm) features a more complex core configuration – 1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra, 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium, and 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro. The 3nm process of the Dimensity 9500 *should* offer better power efficiency, but the Snapdragon benefits from Qualcomm’s established optimization and wider software support. Real-world performance will depend heavily on thermal management, which isn’t specified here.
Battery Life
The vivo X300’s battery endurance of 52:15h is a standout feature, significantly exceeding the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s active use score translating to roughly 12:47h. While the X7 Ultra compensates with faster charging – 100W wired (0-100% in 26 minutes) versus the X300’s 90W – the X300’s longevity is a major advantage for users who dislike frequent charging. The X300 also offers reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X300 if you prioritize all-day battery life and are comfortable with MediaTek’s software optimization. Its 52:15h endurance is unmatched in this class. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you demand the absolute best performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and value the fastest possible charging speeds – reaching 100% in just 26 minutes.