vivo X300 vs OnePlus 12R: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 12R offers a more balanced package. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides proven performance and excellent thermal management, coupled with incredibly fast 100W charging. While the vivo X300 boasts a brighter display and potentially higher peak performance, the 12R’s established reliability and charging speed give it the edge.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X300 | OnePlus 12R |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 13 | 2024, January 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 17 | Available. Released 2024, February 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 150.6 x 71.9 x 8 mm (5.93 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - China | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Reinforced Glass, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.31 inches, 98.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra & 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium & 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Arm G1-Ultra | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 16, up to 5 major Android upgrades, OriginOS 6 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, 4K@120fps HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired 40W wireless Reverse wired | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | · Si/C Li-Ion 6040 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5360 mAh (EU markets) | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Phantom Black, Mist Blue, Summit Red, Iris Purple, Halo Pink | Iron Gray, Cool Blue, Electric Violet, Sunset Dune |
| Models | V2515, V2509A | CPH2609, CPH2585, CPH2611 |
| Price | About 1100 EUR | € 410.84 / $ 399.95 / £ 649.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 52:15h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
vivo X300
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Potentially higher peak performance with Dimensity 9500
- 40W wireless and reverse wired charging
- Longer battery endurance (claimed)
- Unproven chipset – potential for thermal throttling
- Reliance on Mediatek’s software support
OnePlus 12R
- Proven Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Excellent thermal management
- Incredibly fast 100W wired charging
- Established brand reputation and software support
- Dimmer display compared to the vivo X300
- No wireless charging
Display Comparison
The vivo X300’s display significantly outshines the OnePlus 12R in peak brightness, reaching a measured 1930 nits compared to the 12R’s 1181 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the X300’s higher brightness suggests a more advanced panel generation. We lack information on refresh rates or PWM dimming, but the brightness difference is a clear win for the X300, benefiting users who frequently consume content outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely target the upper-midrange segment. We can assume both will feature multi-camera systems, but the quality will depend on sensor size, lens apertures, and image processing algorithms. The absence of information on sensor sizes prevents a definitive statement, but the OnePlus brand generally prioritizes natural image processing, while vivo often leans towards more vibrant, saturated colors. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is likely a marketing gimmick with limited practical value.
Performance
The core of this comparison lies in the chipsets. The vivo X300’s Mediatek Dimensity 9500, built on a 3nm process, theoretically offers greater efficiency and performance than the OnePlus 12R’s 4nm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. The Dimensity 9500’s CPU configuration – a 1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra core, 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium cores, and 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro cores – suggests a focus on peak performance, while the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, and 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 offers a more balanced approach. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 has a proven track record of sustained performance and thermal management, a critical factor for gaming and demanding tasks. The X300’s 3nm node *should* mitigate heat, but real-world testing is needed to confirm.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 12R boasts a significant advantage in charging speed with its 100W wired charging, capable of a full charge in just 26 minutes. The vivo X300’s 90W wired charging is fast, but slower. The X300 also adds 40W wireless charging and reverse wired charging, features absent on the 12R. However, battery endurance is more complex. The X300 claims a 52:15h endurance score and 17:31h active use, while the 12R achieves 14:32h active use. This suggests the X300’s more efficient chipset and potentially larger battery (size not specified) contribute to longer runtimes, despite the 12R’s faster charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X300 if you prioritize display brightness and are willing to gamble on a newer chipset with potentially higher peak performance. This phone is for early adopters who want the latest tech. Buy the OnePlus 12R if you value a proven track record of performance, efficient power management, and incredibly fast charging. It’s the safer, more refined choice for gamers and power users.