vivo X300 vs Honor Magic6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and battery endurance, the vivo X300 emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9500, coupled with a remarkable 52:15h endurance rating, provides a compelling advantage, despite the Magic6 Pro’s strong Snapdragon chipset.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X300 | Honor Magic6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 13 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 17 | Available. Released 2024, January 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front (NanoCrystal Shield), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 150.6 x 71.9 x 8 mm (5.93 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) | 162.5 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - China | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 225 g or 229 g (7.94 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Reinforced Glass, Mohs level 4 | NanoCrystal Shield |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.31 inches, 98.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra & 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium & 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Arm G1-Ultra | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 16, up to 5 major Android upgrades, OriginOS 6 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.4-2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 180 MP, f/2.6, (periscope telephoto), 1/1.49", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, 4K@120fps HDR | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR, 10-bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.93", 0.6µm, AF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired 40W wireless Reverse wired | 80W wired 66W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | · Si/C Li-Ion 6040 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5360 mAh (EU markets) | Si/C Li-Ion 5600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Phantom Black, Mist Blue, Summit Red, Iris Purple, Halo Pink | Black, Green, Blue, Purple, White |
| Models | V2515, V2509A | BVL-AN16, BVL-N49 |
| Price | About 1100 EUR | € 455.54 / $ 899.00 / £ 598.99 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 52:15h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
vivo X300
- Exceptional battery life (52:15h endurance)
- Faster charging speeds (90W wired, 40W wireless)
- Potentially better sustained performance due to 3nm Dimensity 9500
- Display brightness slightly lower than Magic6 Pro
- MediaTek chipset may have less software optimization compared to Qualcomm
Honor Magic6 Pro
- Brighter display (1578 nits)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers strong performance
- Established Qualcomm ecosystem and software support
- Significantly shorter battery life (14:06h active use)
- Slower charging speeds compared to vivo X300
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic6 Pro boasts a brighter display at 1578 nits, compared to the vivo X300’s 1930 nits. While the Magic6 Pro’s brightness is commendable, the X300’s panel achieves a higher peak, potentially offering better visibility in direct sunlight. Both devices likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, though specifics are missing. The difference in brightness, while measurable, may be imperceptible to many users in typical conditions. The X300’s higher peak brightness gives it a slight edge for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, both phones are expected to feature high-end camera systems. The focus should be on sensor size, optical image stabilization (OIS), and image processing algorithms. Given the flagship positioning, both will likely offer excellent image quality in various conditions. The absence of specific details prevents a definitive assessment, but the X300’s chipset’s image signal processor (ISP) capabilities will be crucial in determining its photographic prowess.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X300’s Mediatek Dimensity 9500, built on a 3nm process, features a unique octa-core configuration with a 4.21 GHz C1-Ultra core, suggesting a focus on peak performance. The Honor Magic6 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) utilizes a more conventional architecture (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4). While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is a powerhouse, the Dimensity 9500’s 3nm node promises superior power efficiency and potentially better sustained performance under load, mitigating thermal throttling. The X300’s CPU clock speeds are also notably higher across the board. Both devices will likely feature LPDDR5x RAM, but the X300’s chipset architecture suggests a performance advantage in demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The vivo X300 significantly outperforms the Honor Magic6 Pro in battery endurance, achieving a measured 52:15h compared to the Magic6 Pro’s 14:06h active use score. This substantial difference is likely due to the Dimensity 9500’s superior power efficiency. The X300 also offers faster charging with 90W wired and 40W wireless, while the Magic6 Pro supports 80W wired and 66W wireless. The X300’s reverse wired charging capability adds further versatility. Despite the Magic6 Pro’s respectable charging speeds, the X300’s combination of endurance and charging speed is a clear advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X300 if you need exceptional battery life for all-day use, prioritize sustained gaming performance without thermal throttling, and value faster wired and wireless charging speeds. Buy the Honor Magic6 Pro if you prefer the Qualcomm ecosystem, prioritize a slightly brighter display, and are willing to trade some battery endurance for a potentially more refined software experience.