vivo X300 vs Google Pixel 8 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance, Camera, and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and incredibly fast charging, the vivo X300 is the clear winner. However, the Google Pixel 8 Pro remains the superior choice for those deeply invested in Google’s ecosystem and demanding a best-in-class camera experience, despite its slower charging and shorter battery endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X300 | Google Pixel 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - G1MNW |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G1MNW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 13 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 17 | Available. Released 2023, October 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 150.6 x 71.9 x 8 mm (5.93 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) | 162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - China | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Reinforced Glass, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1344 x 2992 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~489 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.31 inches, 98.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra & 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium & 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Arm G1-Ultra | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | Android 16, up to 5 major Android upgrades, OriginOS 6 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Multi-zone Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.0, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, 4K@120fps HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired 40W wireless Reverse wired | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless Bypass charging |
| Type | · Si/C Li-Ion 6040 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5360 mAh (EU markets) | Li-Ion 5050 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Phantom Black, Mist Blue, Summit Red, Iris Purple, Halo Pink | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Mint |
| Models | V2515, V2509A | GC3VE, G1MNW |
| Price | About 1100 EUR | € 362.00 / $ 289.97 / £ 329.95 / ₹ 54,999 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 52:15h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
vivo X300
- Unmatched CPU performance with Dimensity 9500
- Incredibly fast 90W wired and 40W wireless charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Camera likely lags behind Pixel 8 Pro
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel
Google Pixel 8 Pro
- Exceptional camera quality and computational photography
- Seamless Google software experience and long-term support
- Unique features like Magic Eraser and Best Take
- Slower charging speeds (30W wired, 23W wireless)
- Lower battery endurance compared to vivo X300
Display Comparison
The vivo X300 boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1930 nits compared to the Pixel 8 Pro’s 1600 nits, offering superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates (though not explicitly stated for the X300), the X300’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. The Pixel 8 Pro’s display is known for its color accuracy, but the X300’s extra brightness could be crucial for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 8 Pro’s camera system is its defining feature, leveraging Google’s renowned computational photography algorithms. While specific sensor details are missing for the X300, the Pixel 8 Pro’s emphasis on software processing and features like Magic Eraser and Best Take provides a distinct advantage in image quality and editing capabilities. The Pixel 8 Pro’s video recording prowess is also well-established. The X300 will likely offer a capable camera, but it’s unlikely to match the Pixel 8 Pro’s consistently excellent results, particularly in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 9500 in the vivo X300, fabricated on a 3nm process, is architecturally more aggressive than the Google Tensor G3’s 4nm design. The Dimensity 9500’s octa-core configuration, featuring a 4.21 GHz C1-Ultra core, promises significantly higher peak CPU performance than the Tensor G3’s 3.0 GHz Cortex-X3. However, the Tensor G3’s nona-core setup and focus on AI tasks may offer a smoother experience in specific Google applications. The X300 is likely to excel in raw benchmark scores, while the Pixel 8 Pro prioritizes optimized performance within the Google ecosystem. The X300's newer node should also provide better thermal efficiency.
Battery Life
The vivo X300 demonstrates a significant advantage in battery endurance, achieving a 52:15h rating and 17:31h of active use, compared to the Pixel 8 Pro’s 90h endurance rating (likely an older metric) and 11:14h of active use. This difference is further amplified by the X300’s blazing-fast 90W wired charging, capable of significantly reducing downtime, versus the Pixel 8 Pro’s 30W charging. The X300 also offers 40W wireless charging and reverse wired charging, features the Pixel 8 Pro matches with reverse wireless, but falls behind in wired speed. The Pixel 8 Pro’s ‘bypass charging’ feature, allowing charging directly to the battery while in use, is a unique benefit, but doesn’t offset the overall charging speed disparity.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X300 if you need uncompromising processing power for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value the convenience of 90W wired and 40W wireless charging. Buy the Google Pixel 8 Pro if you prefer a seamless software experience, exceptional camera capabilities with Google’s computational photography, and long-term software support, even if it means sacrificing some charging speed and battery life.