vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi 14 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and consistent performance, the vivo X300 Pro emerges as the winner. Its impressive 48:21h battery endurance and the efficiency of the Dimensity 9500 outweigh the Xiaomi 14 Pro’s faster charging, especially for those who frequently engage in demanding tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X300 Pro | Xiaomi 14 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - China | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 13 | 2023, October 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 17 | Available. Released 2023, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Armor Glass), aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front, aluminum frame or titanium frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.35 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 161.4 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - China | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 226 g (7.97 oz) | 223 g or 230 g (7.87 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Armor Glass, Mohs level 4 | Shatterproof glass |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, Dolby Vision, 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra & 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium & 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Arm G1-Ultra | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 16, up to 5 major Android upgrades, OriginOS 6 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 200 MP, f/2.7, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 2.7:1 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, 4K@120fps 10-bit Log, Dolby Vision HDR | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired 40W wireless Reverse wireless Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless, 100% in 40 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | · Si/C Li-Ion 6510 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5440 mAh (EU markets) | Li-Po 4880 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Phantom Black, Mist Blue, Dune Brown, Cloud White | Black, Silver, Titanium, Green |
| Models | V2514, V2502A | 23116PN5BC |
| Price | About 1400 EUR | About 650 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 48:21h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
vivo X300 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (48:21h endurance)
- Efficient 3nm Dimensity 9500 chipset
- Long-term battery health (1200 cycles)
- Reverse wired charging
- Slower wired charging than Xiaomi 14 Pro
- Wireless charging speed is slower
Xiaomi 14 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging (18 min 0-100%)
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset
- Faster 50W wireless charging
- Likely excellent camera system (based on brand reputation)
- Shorter battery life compared to vivo X300 Pro
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The vivo X300 Pro boasts a peak brightness of 2113 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Xiaomi 14 Pro’s display specs aren’t provided, Xiaomi flagships typically employ high-quality LTPO panels for adaptive refresh rates, potentially offering smoother scrolling and improved power efficiency. However, without specific data on the Xiaomi 14 Pro’s panel technology and peak brightness, the X300 Pro currently holds the advantage in measured display performance.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, both brands are known for their camera prowess. The Xiaomi 14 Pro, given Xiaomi’s recent focus, likely features a large main sensor with advanced image processing algorithms. The X300 Pro, inheriting vivo’s camera heritage, will likely prioritize color accuracy and portrait mode capabilities. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and lens apertures prevents a definitive assessment.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X300 Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9500, fabricated on a 3nm process, featuring an octa-core configuration with a high-clocked 4.21 GHz C1-Ultra core. This architecture suggests a focus on maximizing single-core performance for responsive UI and app loading. Conversely, the Xiaomi 14 Pro employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm), with a more balanced core configuration. While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s Cortex-X4 core reaches 3.3 GHz, the Dimensity 9500’s higher clock speed and newer process node could translate to superior efficiency and sustained performance during extended gaming sessions. The 3nm process of the Dimensity 9500 should also result in lower heat generation.
Battery Life
The vivo X300 Pro’s battery endurance of 48:21h is a standout feature, supported by 1200 charge cycles, indicating long-term battery health. While the Xiaomi 14 Pro offers a significantly faster 120W wired charging (100% in 18 minutes) compared to the X300 Pro’s 90W, the X300 Pro’s longer endurance mitigates the need for frequent top-ups. The Xiaomi 14 Pro’s 50W wireless charging is also faster than the X300 Pro’s 40W, but the X300 Pro offers the convenience of reverse wired charging, a feature absent in the Xiaomi 14 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X300 Pro if you need a phone that will comfortably last through two full days of moderate to heavy use, and value a chipset optimized for sustained performance over raw benchmark scores. Buy the Xiaomi 14 Pro if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging speeds available, and frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery quickly, even if it means sacrificing some overall endurance.