vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi 13 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and battery longevity, the vivo X300 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9500 chipset, coupled with exceptional 48:21h endurance, provides a noticeable advantage over the Xiaomi 13 Ultra's Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and shorter active use score of 10:09h.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X300 Pro | Xiaomi 13 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - China | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 13 | 2023, April 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 17 | Available. Released 2023, April 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Armor Glass), aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.35 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 163.2 x 74.6 x 9.1 mm (6.43 x 2.94 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - China | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 226 g (7.97 oz) | 227 g (8.01 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Armor Glass, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, Dolby Vision, 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1300 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra & 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium & 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Arm G1-Ultra | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 16, up to 5 major Android upgrades, OriginOS 6 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lenses, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 67mm filter ring holder (optional) |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.9 or f/4.0, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.8, 75mm (telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.0, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.8, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 200 MP, f/2.7, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 2.7:1 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, 4K@120fps 10-bit Log, Dolby Vision HDR | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR 10-bit rec. (4K@60fps, 1080p) |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired 40W wireless Reverse wireless Reverse wired | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 35 min 50W wireless, 100% in 49 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | · Si/C Li-Ion 6510 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5440 mAh (EU markets) | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Phantom Black, Mist Blue, Dune Brown, Cloud White | Black, Olive Green, White, Orange, Yellow, Blue |
| Models | V2514, V2502A | 2304FPN6DC, 2304FPN6DG |
| Price | About 1400 EUR | € 797.98 / $ 389.69 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 48:21h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
vivo X300 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (48:21h endurance)
- Cutting-edge Dimensity 9500 chipset (3nm)
- Higher peak display brightness (2113 nits)
- Camera specifications unknown
- Brand recognition may be lower than Xiaomi
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
- Renowned camera system (Xiaomi Ultra series)
- Mature software experience
- Fast 90W wired charging (35 min to 100%)
- Shorter battery life (10:09h active use)
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 may throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both devices feature high-end displays, but the vivo X300 Pro takes a slight lead with a measured peak brightness of 2113 nits, significantly exceeding the Xiaomi 13 Ultra’s 1207 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates (not specified in data), the X300 Pro’s higher brightness is a tangible benefit for outdoor users. The Xiaomi 13 Ultra’s display is still excellent, but the X300 Pro offers a more impactful visual experience.
Camera Comparison
The provided data highlights the Xiaomi 13 Ultra’s focus on camera capabilities, though specifics are limited. While the X300 Pro’s camera specs are absent, Xiaomi’s Ultra series is renowned for its advanced imaging systems. The 13 Ultra likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. However, without detailed specifications for the X300 Pro, a definitive camera comparison is impossible. It’s reasonable to assume the Xiaomi 13 Ultra holds an advantage in image quality and versatility, particularly in challenging lighting conditions, given its brand reputation.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X300 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9500, built on a 3nm process, promises superior efficiency and performance compared to the Xiaomi 13 Ultra’s 4nm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. The Dimensity 9500’s octa-core configuration, with a peak clock speed of 4.21 GHz on the C1-Ultra core, suggests a focus on single-core performance, crucial for responsive UI and app loading. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while powerful, may exhibit more thermal throttling under sustained load due to its larger process node. The X300 Pro’s architecture is designed for efficiency, potentially leading to cooler operation and longer peak performance durations.
Battery Life
The vivo X300 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving a remarkable 48:21h rating and a 12:45h active use score. This significantly surpasses the Xiaomi 13 Ultra’s active use score of 10:09h and older endurance rating of 108h. Both support 90W wired charging, with the Xiaomi 13 Ultra claiming a full charge in 35 minutes. The X300 Pro also offers 40W wireless and reverse wireless charging, while the 13 Ultra provides 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless. The X300 Pro’s superior endurance, combined with competitive charging speeds, makes it the more practical choice for users who prioritize all-day battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X300 Pro if you need maximum battery life, sustained gaming performance, and the latest chipset technology. It’s ideal for power users who demand all-day usability and aren’t heavily invested in a specific camera ecosystem. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Ultra if you prioritize a mature camera system with extensive features, and are willing to trade some battery life for a well-refined software experience and established brand reputation.