vivo X300 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around excellence, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its slightly superior active use battery life, coupled with a more refined software experience and established camera prowess, makes it the safer, more polished choice. However, the vivo X300 Pro’s blazing-fast 90W charging and potentially higher peak performance offer compelling advantages for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X300 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - China | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 13 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 17 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Armor Glass), aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front (Corning Gorilla Armor), glass back (Corning Gorilla Armor), titanium frame (grade 2) |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.35 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - China | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | 226 g (7.97 oz) | 232 g or 233 g (8.18 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Armor Glass, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Armor |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~505 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 113.5 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, Dolby Vision, 4500 nits (peak) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra & 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium & 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro) | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Arm G1-Ultra | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) |
| OS | Android 16, up to 5 major Android upgrades, OriginOS 6 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 200 MP, f/2.7, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 2.7:1 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, 4K@120fps 10-bit Log, Dolby Vision HDR | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired 40W wireless Reverse wireless Reverse wired | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | · Si/C Li-Ion 6510 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5440 mAh (EU markets) | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Phantom Black, Mist Blue, Dune Brown, Cloud White | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange |
| Models | V2514, V2502A | SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS, SM-S928U, SM-S928U1, SM-S928W, SM-S928N, SM-S9280, SM-S928E, SM-S928E/DS |
| Price | About 1400 EUR | $ 514.94 / C$ 929.99 / £ 630.00 / € 658.53 / ₹ 84,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.26 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 48:21h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
vivo X300 Pro
- Blazing-fast 90W wired charging
- Higher peak display brightness (2113 nits)
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance with Dimensity 9500
- Long battery lifespan with 1200 charge cycles
- Less established software ecosystem
- Camera performance is currently unknown
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Superior active use battery life (13:49h)
- Refined software experience and ecosystem
- Established camera prowess and video capabilities
- Excellent thermal management with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Slower charging speeds (45W wired)
- Lower peak display brightness (1447 nits)
Display Comparison
The vivo X300 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 2113 nits compared to the S24 Ultra’s 1447 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, the X300 Pro’s peak brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor users. The S24 Ultra’s display is still excellent, but the X300 Pro takes the lead in sheer luminance. We expect both to have excellent color accuracy, but independent testing will be needed to confirm.
Camera Comparison
Samsung has historically excelled in camera performance, and the S24 Ultra is expected to continue this trend. While specific sensor details are missing for both, Samsung’s image processing algorithms are highly refined. The X300 Pro’s camera capabilities are less known, but vivo has been steadily improving its camera technology. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. We’ll need to analyze image samples to assess dynamic range, color accuracy, and low-light performance. The S24 Ultra’s video capabilities are likely to be superior, given Samsung’s expertise in this area.
Performance
The core of this comparison lies in the chipsets. The Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3nm) in the X300 Pro features a unique core configuration – 1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra, 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium, and 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro – suggesting a focus on sustained peak performance. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) in the S24 Ultra, while clocked lower at 3.39GHz for its Cortex-X4 prime core, benefits from Qualcomm’s optimizations and a more mature software ecosystem. The 4nm process of the Snapdragon offers better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. The X300 Pro’s 3nm node *should* offer similar benefits, but real-world testing is crucial. Both phones utilize LPDDR5x RAM, ensuring ample memory bandwidth.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra edges out the vivo X300 Pro in active use battery life, achieving 13:49h compared to the X300 Pro’s 12:45h. However, the X300 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging – 90W wired, capable of replenishing the battery much quicker than the S24 Ultra’s 45W wired charging (65% in 30 minutes). The X300 Pro also offers 40W wireless and reverse wireless charging, while the S24 Ultra is limited to 15W wireless and 4.5W reverse wireless. The X300 Pro’s 1200 charge cycles suggest a focus on long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X300 Pro if you need the absolute fastest charging speeds available on a smartphone and are comfortable with a potentially less refined software experience. Its 90W wired and 40W wireless charging are unmatched. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra if you prefer a more mature ecosystem, a consistently excellent camera system, and a longer-lasting battery during typical daily use, even if it means slower charging.