vivo X300 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance

The vivo X300 Pro arrives challenging Samsung’s established dominance with the Galaxy S23 Ultra. While the S23 Ultra remains a benchmark for Android flagships, the X300 Pro’s new Mediatek Dimensity 9500 chipset and rapid charging capabilities present a compelling alternative. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing all-around excellence, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra remains the safer bet. Its mature software, versatile camera system, and established ecosystem outweigh the X300 Pro’s raw performance potential and faster charging, though the X300 Pro is a strong contender.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo X300 Pro Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - ChinaHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub61, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
 -1, 7, 28, 41, 66, 71, 78, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA
Launch
Announced2025, October 132023, February 01
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, October 17Available. Released 2023, February 17
Body
BuildGlass front (Armor Glass), aluminum alloy frame, glass backGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame
Dimensions161.2 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.35 x 2.97 x 0.31 in)163.4 x 78.1 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - China· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)
Weight226 g (7.97 oz)234 g (8.25 oz)
 -IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) Stylus (Bluetooth integration, accelerometer, gyro)
Display
ProtectionArmor Glass, Mohs level 4Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Resolution1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density)1440 x 3088 pixels, 19.3:9 ratio (~500 ppi density)
Size6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio)6.8 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeLTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, Dolby Vision, 4500 nits (peak)Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1750 nits (peak)
 -Always-on display
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra & 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium & 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro)Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm)Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
GPUArm G1-UltraAdreno 740
OSAndroid 16, up to 5 major Android upgrades, OriginOS 6Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM
 -UFS 4.0
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT importLaser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama
Quad-200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 10 MP, f/4.9, 230mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 10x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video
Single-12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), Dual Pixel PDAF
Triple50 MP, f/1.6, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 200 MP, f/2.7, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 2.7:1 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF-
Video8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, 4K@120fps 10-bit Log, Dolby Vision HDR8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR, HDR10+
Single50 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -No
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 -32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 55.3, A2DP, LE
Infrared portYes-
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.2, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
 -Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) Ultra Wideband (UWB) support
Battery
Charging90W wired 40W wireless Reverse wireless Reverse wired45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless
Type· Si/C Li-Ion 6510 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5440 mAh (EU markets)Li-Ion 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsPhantom Black, Mist Blue, Dune Brown, Cloud WhitePhantom Black, Green, Cream, Lavender, Graphite, Sky Blue, Lime, Red, BMW M Edition
ModelsV2514, V2502ASM-S918B, SM-S918B/DS, SM-S918U, SM-S918U1, SM-S918W, SM-S918N, SM-S9180, SM-S918E, SM-S918E/DS
PriceAbout 1400 EUR€ 549.90 / $ 454.99 / £ 433.00
SAR-1.12 W/kg (head)     0.92 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.96 W/kg (head)     1.40 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 126h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -25.6 LUFS (Very good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 1241531 (v9) GeekBench: 4927 (v5.1) GFXBench: 67fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)
EU LABEL
Battery48:21h endurance, 1200 cycles-
EnergyClass B-
Free fallClass B (180 falls)-
RepairabilityClass C-

vivo X300 Pro

  • Significantly faster 90W wired charging
  • Potentially superior performance with Dimensity 9500 (3nm)
  • Higher peak display brightness for outdoor visibility

  • Less established software ecosystem
  • Limited camera details in provided context

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

  • Mature and polished software experience
  • Versatile and highly-rated camera system
  • Long-term software support from Samsung

  • Slower 45W wired charging
  • Lower peak display brightness

Display Comparison

The vivo X300 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 2113 nits compared to the S23 Ultra’s 1274 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates (not explicitly stated for the X300 Pro, but highly probable given its flagship status), the S23 Ultra’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a more refined panel calibration. The practical impact is a more vibrant and punchy image on the Samsung, but the vivo offers a clear advantage in outdoor readability.

Camera Comparison

The context data for both devices is limited to 'Photo / Video', making a detailed comparison difficult. However, Samsung’s history suggests a highly sophisticated camera system with advanced computational photography. The S23 Ultra’s larger sensor (likely 200MP, based on market trends) and extensive OIS system will likely outperform the X300 Pro in low-light conditions and video stabilization. While the X300 Pro may offer competitive image quality, Samsung’s established expertise in image processing gives it a likely advantage. The absence of details on the X300 Pro’s camera specs makes a definitive judgment impossible.

Performance

The core battleground is the chipset. The vivo X300 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9500, fabricated on a 3nm process, promises superior efficiency and performance compared to the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra’s 4nm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. The Dimensity 9500’s octa-core configuration, with its 4.21 GHz C1-Ultra core, suggests a focus on peak performance, while the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 prioritizes sustained performance. The Snapdragon’s Cortex-X3 core is clocked lower at 3.36 GHz, but benefits from Qualcomm’s optimization. Real-world performance will depend on thermal management, but the 3nm node gives the X300 Pro a theoretical edge. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, minimizing memory bottlenecks.

Battery Life

The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra achieves a 13:24h active use score, slightly exceeding the vivo X300 Pro’s 12:45h. However, the X300 Pro’s 90W wired charging is a game-changer, significantly faster than the S23 Ultra’s 45W. The X300 Pro also offers 40W wireless and reverse wireless charging, while the S23 Ultra is limited to 15W wireless and 4.5W reverse wireless. The X300 Pro’s 1200 charge cycles suggest a focus on long-term battery health. While the S23 Ultra’s endurance rating of 126h is respectable, the X300 Pro’s charging speed mitigates any concerns about slightly lower endurance.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo X300 Pro if you prioritize cutting-edge processor performance, incredibly fast 90W charging, and are comfortable with a potentially less refined software experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra if you value a polished, feature-rich experience, a class-leading camera system, and long-term software support, even if it means sacrificing some charging speed.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Dimensity 9500 in the vivo X300 Pro overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The 3nm fabrication process of the Dimensity 9500 should improve thermal efficiency compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s 4nm process. However, sustained performance will depend on vivo’s thermal management solution. Early reports will be crucial to determine if throttling occurs during prolonged, demanding tasks.
❓ How does the 90W charging on the vivo X300 Pro compare to the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra in real-world usage?
The X300 Pro’s 90W charging can likely fully charge the battery in under 30 minutes, while the S23 Ultra’s 45W charging takes closer to an hour. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The X300 Pro also supports reverse wired charging, a feature not available on the S23 Ultra.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra’s camera offer significant improvements in low-light photography compared to the vivo X300 Pro?
Based on Samsung’s track record and the likely larger sensor size of the S23 Ultra, it’s expected to perform better in low-light conditions. Samsung’s advanced image processing algorithms also contribute to superior noise reduction and detail preservation in challenging lighting scenarios.