vivo X300 Pro vs OnePlus 12R: A Head-to-Head Flagship Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the OnePlus 12R emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers a proven track record of stability and efficiency, coupled with 100W charging. However, the X300 Pro’s brighter display and potentially longer battery lifespan make it a compelling alternative.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X300 Pro | OnePlus 12R |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - China | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 13 | 2024, January 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 17 | Available. Released 2024, February 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Armor Glass), aluminum alloy frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.35 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - China | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 226 g (7.97 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Armor Glass, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, Dolby Vision, 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra & 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium & 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Arm G1-Ultra | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 16, up to 5 major Android upgrades, OriginOS 6 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 200 MP, f/2.7, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 2.7:1 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, 4K@120fps 10-bit Log, Dolby Vision HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired 40W wireless Reverse wireless Reverse wired | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | · Si/C Li-Ion 6510 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5440 mAh (EU markets) | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Phantom Black, Mist Blue, Dune Brown, Cloud White | Iron Gray, Cool Blue, Electric Violet, Sunset Dune |
| Models | V2514, V2502A | CPH2609, CPH2585, CPH2611 |
| Price | About 1400 EUR | € 410.84 / $ 399.95 / £ 649.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 48:21h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
vivo X300 Pro
- Significantly brighter display (2113 nits)
- Potentially longer battery endurance (48:21h)
- Latest Mediatek Dimensity 9500 chipset
- 40W Wireless and Reverse Charging
- Slower wired charging (90W vs 100W)
- Chipset performance unproven in real-world scenarios
OnePlus 12R
- Proven Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Incredibly fast 100W charging (26 min)
- Excellent thermal efficiency
- Established software ecosystem
- Lower peak display brightness (1181 nits)
- Slightly shorter battery endurance
Display Comparison
The vivo X300 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 2113 nits, compared to the OnePlus 12R’s 1181 nits. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the X300 Pro’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor users. Details regarding refresh rate and panel technology (LTPO) are missing, but both are expected to offer smooth scrolling and adaptive refresh rates. The OnePlus 12R’s lower brightness doesn’t necessarily mean a poor experience, but the X300 Pro offers a more vibrant and readable display in challenging conditions.
Camera Comparison
Context data lacks camera specifics, so analysis relies on brand tendencies. Vivo typically emphasizes camera capabilities, potentially giving the X300 Pro an edge in image processing and features. However, without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively assess camera performance. The OnePlus 12R is expected to deliver solid, reliable camera performance, but may not prioritize cutting-edge features to the same extent as Vivo. We can assume both phones will offer a versatile camera system, but the X300 Pro may have a slight advantage in image quality and software features.
Performance
The core of this comparison lies in the chipsets. The vivo X300 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9500, built on a 3nm process, theoretically offers greater efficiency and performance compared to the OnePlus 12R’s 4nm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. The Dimensity 9500’s CPU configuration – 1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra, 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium, and 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro – suggests a focus on peak performance, while the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, and 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 offers a more balanced approach. The 3nm node of the Dimensity 9500 *should* translate to better thermal management, but real-world testing is crucial to confirm this. Both phones likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, ensuring fast memory access.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 12R’s 100W wired charging, capable of a full charge in 26 minutes, is a significant advantage over the vivo X300 Pro’s 90W charging. While the X300 Pro boasts a longer measured battery endurance of 48:21h compared to the 12R’s active use score translating to roughly 40-45 hours, the 12R’s faster charging mitigates concerns about battery life. The X300 Pro also offers 40W wireless and reverse wireless/wired charging, adding convenience, but the 12R’s charging speed is a compelling differentiator.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X300 Pro if you prioritize peak display brightness, potentially longer battery endurance (based on the 48:21h endurance rating), and are willing to explore Mediatek’s newest chipset. Buy the OnePlus 12R if you value a proven, thermally efficient chipset, incredibly fast 100W charging, and a more established software ecosystem.