vivo X30 vs Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and battery efficiency, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 765G, built on a 7nm process, offers a more refined experience than the 8nm Exynos 980 in the vivo X30, despite the latter's slightly higher clock speeds. The Mi 10 Lite also boasts comparable battery life and faster charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X30 | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (3.6+ Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December. Released 2019, December | 2020, March 27. Released 2020, May 25 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 74.1 x 8.8 mm (6.24 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) | 163.7 x 74.8 x 7.9 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196.5 g (6.95 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR, 800 nits (typ) | AMOLED, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 980 (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 10.0 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 20W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | 4350 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Peach, Light Blue, Rainbow Shadow | Aurora Blue, Cosmic Gray, Dream White |
| Models | V1938CT | M2002J9G, M2002J9S, XIG01 |
| Price | About 420 EUR | About 130 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.74 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | £ 312.99 |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | - | £ 399.99 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 272.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 103h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.6 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 318117 (v8) GeekBench: 1927 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X30
- Potentially faster peak CPU performance
- 33W fast charging
- vivo's typically strong camera software
- 8nm Exynos 980 may throttle under sustained load
- Display brightness is unknown and potentially lower
- Less efficient chipset compared to Snapdragon 765G
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
- More efficient 7nm Snapdragon 765G
- 610 nits peak display brightness
- PD3.0 and QC4 charging compatibility
- Competitive pricing, especially the 128GB/6GB RAM model
- Slower 20W charging (though compatible with faster PD/QC)
- 2MP macro camera is likely of limited utility
- Potentially less aggressive CPU boost compared to Exynos
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G’s display is rated at 610 nits of peak brightness, a measurable advantage over the unspecified brightness of the vivo X30’s panel. While both feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for OLED/AMOLED), the Mi 10 Lite’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. Details regarding panel technology (LTPO, refresh rate) are missing for both, but the Mi 10 Lite’s brightness gives it a slight edge for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Mi 10 Lite likely prioritizes software optimization and versatile shooting modes, while the X30 might lean towards a more natural image processing style, typical of vivo. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Mi 10 Lite is unlikely to significantly impact image quality and should be considered a secondary feature.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X30 utilizes the Exynos 980, fabricated on an 8nm process, featuring a dual-cluster CPU configuration with 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G, however, employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, built on a more efficient 7nm process. This process node advantage, coupled with the Snapdragon’s Kryo CPU architecture (1x 2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x 2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x 1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver), generally results in better sustained performance and thermal management. While the Exynos 980 may show slightly higher peak scores in benchmarks, the Snapdragon 765G is likely to maintain higher clock speeds for longer periods, reducing throttling during gaming or intensive tasks.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 103 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The vivo X30 supports 33W wired charging, while the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G offers 20W wired charging with support for PD3.0 and QC4. While 33W is faster, the Mi 10 Lite’s support for Power Delivery and Quick Charge allows for compatibility with a wider range of chargers and potentially faster charging with compatible adapters. The 7nm Snapdragon 765G’s efficiency also contributes to the Mi 10 Lite’s strong endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X30 if you prioritize a potentially faster peak CPU performance for short bursts of demanding tasks and are comfortable with potentially more aggressive thermal throttling. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G if you value consistent performance, better power efficiency for all-day use, and a more balanced feature set, especially considering its competitive pricing – particularly the 128GB/6GB RAM variant at £312.99.