Oppo Find X2 Pro vs. vivo X30 Pro: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X2 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset delivers significantly faster performance, complemented by 65W SuperVOOC charging. While the X30 Pro offers a respectable experience, the Find X2 Pro’s raw power and faster charging justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X30 Pro | Oppo Find X2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (3.6+ Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December. Released 2019, December | 2020, March 06 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 74.1 x 8.8 mm (6.24 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) | 165.2 x 74.4 x 8.8 mm (Ceramic) / 9.5mm (Leather) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) | 217 g (Ceramic) / 200 g (Leather) (7.05 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR, 800 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 980 (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 10.0 | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/3.0, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 32 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 129mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | 4350 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4260 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Peach, Light Blue | Black, Orange, Gray, Green, Lamborghini Edition |
| Models | V1938T | CPH2025, PDEM30, OPG01 |
| Price | About 600 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 593717 (v8) GeekBench: 13245 (v4.4), 3269 (v5.1) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X30 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Respectable 5G performance
- Competent camera system
- Slower Exynos 980 processor
- Slower 33W charging
- Display specs are unknown
Oppo Find X2 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 865 chipset
- Ultra-fast 65W SuperVOOC charging
- Bright and high-contrast display
- Higher price tag
- Potential for thermal throttling under extreme load (though mitigated by 7nm+ process)
- Camera details are not specified
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X2 Pro boasts a superior display experience, achieving a measured peak brightness of 871 nits. While both phones lack specified refresh rates in the provided data, the Find X2 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a high-quality OLED panel. The X30 Pro’s display specs are absent, making a direct comparison difficult, but the Find X2 Pro’s brightness advantage is clear for outdoor visibility. The Find X2 Pro’s display is geared towards content consumption and gaming in all lighting conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is missing. However, given Oppo’s camera reputation, the Find X2 Pro likely features a more advanced camera system. The absence of specific details necessitates a reliance on brand positioning; Oppo typically prioritizes camera innovation in its flagship models. The Find X2 Pro likely benefits from a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms, resulting in superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The X30 Pro’s camera is likely competent, but unlikely to match the Find X2 Pro’s capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo Find X2 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7nm+), while the vivo X30 Pro features the Exynos 980 (8nm). The Snapdragon 865’s octa-core CPU, with its 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 prime core and 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 performance cores, provides a substantial performance advantage over the X30 Pro’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The 7nm+ fabrication process of the Snapdragon 865 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. This translates to smoother gaming and faster app loading times on the Find X2 Pro.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 88 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Oppo Find X2 Pro’s 65W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer, fully charging the device in just 38 minutes. The vivo X30 Pro’s 33W charging is significantly slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the Find X2 Pro mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage, offering greater convenience and reduced downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X30 Pro if you prioritize a more affordable 5G experience and are comfortable with slightly less processing power. It’s ideal for everyday tasks, social media, and casual gaming. Buy the Oppo Find X2 Pro if you demand the best possible performance for demanding games, video editing, or multitasking, and value the fastest charging speeds available at the time.