OnePlus 8 Pro vs. vivo X30 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 8 Pro emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset provides significantly better performance and sustained speeds, while its robust battery endurance and faster charging options offer a more reliable experience. However, the vivo X30 Pro presents a compelling value proposition for budget-conscious users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X30 Pro | OnePlus 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 28, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (3.6+ Gbps DL) | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G 7.5 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 78 SA/NSA - IN | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December. Released 2019, December | 2020, April 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, April 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 74.1 x 8.8 mm (6.24 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) | 165.3 x 74.4 x 8.5 mm (6.51 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR, 800 nits (typ) | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 980 (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 10.0 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/3.0, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 32 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1/1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.4, (Color filter camera) |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 30W wired, 50% in 23 min 30W wireless, 50% in 30 min 3W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4350 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4510 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Peach, Light Blue | Glacial Green, Ultramarine Blue, Onyx Black |
| Models | V1938T | IN2023, IN2020, IN2021, IN2025 |
| Price | About 600 EUR | About 310 EUR |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | $ 428.39 |
| 256GB 12GB RAM | - | $ 853.51 |
| RENEWED | - | $ 486.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 103h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 573276 (v8) GeekBench: 3374 (v5.1) GFXBench: 24fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X30 Pro
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 865
- Faster charging speeds (wired and wireless)
- Excellent battery endurance (103h rating)
- Higher price point
- Can get warm under heavy load
OnePlus 8 Pro
- More affordable price
- Competitive 33W wired charging
- Sleek design
- Less powerful Exynos 980 chipset
- Limited information on camera specs
Display Comparison
Both devices boast 'Infinite' contrast ratios, suggesting excellent OLED panels. However, detailed specifications like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing for the vivo X30 Pro. The OnePlus 8 Pro’s display benefits from a 120Hz refresh rate (not specified for the X30 Pro), resulting in smoother scrolling and animations. While both likely offer excellent viewing experiences, the OnePlus 8 Pro’s higher refresh rate provides a tangible advantage for visually intensive tasks and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but specifics beyond 'Photo / Video' are limited for the vivo X30 Pro. The OnePlus 8 Pro likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 865, offering advanced image processing capabilities. Sensor size and aperture details are crucial for low-light performance, but are unavailable for the X30 Pro. The OnePlus 8 Pro’s camera system is known for its versatility and image quality, while the X30 Pro’s camera performance remains less defined without detailed specifications.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 8 Pro’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) significantly outperforms the vivo X30 Pro’s Exynos 980 (8nm). The Snapdragon 865 features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 prime core versus the Exynos 980’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 cores – and a more robust GPU. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The 7nm+ fabrication process of the Snapdragon 865 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The OnePlus 8 Pro’s 12GB RAM option (vs. up to 8GB on the X30 Pro) further enhances multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 8 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 103 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the exact battery capacity isn't specified, the 30W wired charging (50% in 23 minutes) and 30W wireless charging (50% in 30 minutes) are significant advantages over the vivo X30 Pro’s 33W wired charging. The addition of 3W reverse wireless charging on the OnePlus 8 Pro provides added convenience for charging accessories. The X30 Pro’s charging speed is competitive, but the OnePlus 8 Pro’s wireless charging and reverse wireless charging capabilities offer greater flexibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X30 Pro if you prioritize a lower upfront cost and are willing to accept some performance compromises. It's ideal for everyday tasks, social media, and casual gaming. Buy the OnePlus 8 Pro if you demand top-tier performance for demanding applications, gaming, and photography, and value faster charging and longer battery life. It's the better choice for power users and those who want a future-proofed device.