vivo X30 Pro vs Huawei P40 Pro+: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balanced experience, the Huawei P40 Pro+ emerges as the stronger contender. Its Kirin 990 5G chipset offers a performance edge, coupled with a superior display and more versatile charging options. However, the X30 Pro remains a viable option for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X30 Pro | Huawei P40 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (3.6+ Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December. Released 2019, December | 2020, March 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, June 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, ceramic back, ceramic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 74.1 x 8.8 mm (6.24 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) | 158.2 x 72.6 x 9 mm (6.23 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) | 226 g (7.97 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1200 x 2640 pixels (~441 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR, 800 nits (typ) | OLED, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex A55) | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 980 (8 nm) | Kirin 990 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 | Mali-G76 MP16 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 10.0 | Android 10, EMUI 10.1, no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Leica optics, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/3.0, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 32 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/4.4, 240mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 10x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 40 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), 1/1.54", PDAF TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720@7680fps, 1080p@960fps, HDR; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF IR TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Infrared Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 40W wired 40W wireless 27W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4350 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Peach, Light Blue | White Ceramic, Black Ceramic |
| Models | V1938T | ELS-N39, ELS-AN10 |
| Price | About 600 EUR | About 1000 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 95h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 529687 (v8) GeekBench: 3203 (v5.1) GFXBench: 31fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X30 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Decent overall performance for everyday tasks
- Fast 33W wired charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to Kirin 990 5G
- No wireless charging support
- Likely inferior camera performance
Huawei P40 Pro+
- Superior chipset performance with Kirin 990 5G
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Versatile charging options (40W wired, 40W wireless, 27W reverse wireless)
- Higher price compared to vivo X30 Pro
- May be harder to find in good condition due to age
- Potential software update limitations
Display Comparison
The Huawei P40 Pro+ boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured 760 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the X30 Pro. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both displays likely feature OLED technology, the P40 Pro+'s 'Infinite' contrast ratio suggests a more refined panel with deeper blacks. The absence of refresh rate data for the X30 Pro suggests it likely operates at a standard 60Hz, while the P40 Pro+’s display technology is unknown, but a higher refresh rate is possible.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are marketed as camera-centric, but the P40 Pro+ likely holds a significant edge. While specific sensor details are missing, the P40 Pro+’s reputation centers around its advanced camera system. The focus on 'Photo / Video' suggests a comprehensive feature set. The X30 Pro’s camera, while competent, is unlikely to match the P40 Pro+'s image processing capabilities or low-light performance. The absence of details on the X30 Pro’s camera system makes a detailed comparison difficult, but it’s reasonable to assume the P40 Pro+ offers greater zoom capabilities and overall image quality.
Performance
The Kirin 990 5G in the P40 Pro+ utilizes a 7nm+ process, offering a theoretical advantage in power efficiency and transistor density over the X30 Pro’s 8nm Exynos 980. The P40 Pro+'s CPU configuration – with two high-performance Cortex-A76 cores and two more Cortex-A76 cores – suggests a more sustained performance advantage in multi-threaded tasks compared to the X30 Pro’s mix of Cortex-A77 and A55 cores. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Kirin’s architecture is geared towards more consistent high-end performance. The X30 Pro’s Exynos 980, while capable, may exhibit more thermal throttling under prolonged heavy loads.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 95 hours, indicating comparable real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities. However, the P40 Pro+ significantly outpaces the X30 Pro in charging speed, offering 40W wired charging, 40W wireless charging, and even 27W reverse wireless charging. The X30 Pro is limited to 33W wired charging. This means the P40 Pro+ can achieve a full charge much faster and offers the convenience of wireless charging, a feature absent on the X30 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X30 Pro if you need a capable all-rounder with decent performance and fast charging at a significantly lower price point. It’s ideal for everyday tasks, social media, and casual gaming. Buy the Huawei P40 Pro+ if you prioritize camera versatility, a brighter display, and faster charging – both wired and wireless – and are willing to spend a bit more for a more premium experience.