vivo X200s vs Xiaomi 14T Pro: A Flagship Face-Off

The vivo X200s and Xiaomi 14T Pro represent the cutting edge of Mediatek-powered Android smartphones. While both aim for a premium experience, they diverge in key areas like chipset architecture, charging speed, and potentially, target audience. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device delivers the most compelling package.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing raw processing power and future-proofing, the vivo X200s, with its Dimensity 9400+ chipset, emerges as the winner. However, the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s significantly faster 120W charging and proven battery life make it a strong contender for those valuing convenience and all-day usability.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo X200s Xiaomi 14T Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 25, 26, 28A, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub61, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2025, April 212024, September 26
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, April 25Available. Released 2024, September 26
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X)
Dimensions160 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.31 in)160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight203 g (7.16 oz)209 g (7.37 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density)1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density)
Size6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio)6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 5000 nits (peak)AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720)Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm)
GPUImmortalis-G925Immortalis-G720 MC12
OSAndroid 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 5 (China)Android 14, HyperOS
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT importLeica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 55.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L1+L5)GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging90W wired 40W wireless Reverse wired120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min
TypeSi/C Li-Ion 6200 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsGray, Silver, Mint, PurpleTitan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black
ModelsV2458A2407FPN8EG
PriceAbout 510 EUR$ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99
SAR EU-0.99 W/kg (head)     1.00 W/kg (body)

vivo X200s

  • Potentially superior CPU performance with Dimensity 9400+
  • More advanced CPU core configuration
  • 3nm process for improved efficiency

  • Slower wired charging (90W vs 120W)
  • Battery capacity currently unknown
  • Display specifications not yet available

Xiaomi 14T Pro

  • Ultra-fast 120W wired charging
  • Bright 1228 nit display
  • Proven 12:32h battery life

  • Older Dimensity 9300+ chipset
  • Less advanced CPU core configuration
  • 4nm process less efficient than 3nm

Display Comparison

The Xiaomi 14T Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1228 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the X200s’ display specifications are currently unavailable, vivo typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The 14T Pro’s brightness advantage is a tangible benefit for outdoor use. The absence of LTPO information for the X200s suggests the 14T Pro may offer more adaptive refresh rate control, potentially improving battery life. Color accuracy and delta-E values remain unknown for both, requiring further testing.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications for the X200s, a direct comparison is limited. However, both phones are expected to feature multi-camera systems. The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s image processing is known for its vibrant, often saturated, color profiles. The X200s, leveraging the newer chipset’s ISP, may offer improved computational photography capabilities and potentially better low-light performance. Sensor size and OIS implementation will be crucial differentiating factors, but remain unknown for the X200s at this time. We can assume both will offer capable main sensors, but the X200s’ ISP could provide an edge in dynamic range and detail.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo X200s utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3nm) while the Xiaomi 14T Pro features the Dimensity 9300+ (4nm). The 9400+’s Cortex-X925 core, clocked at 3.73 GHz, represents a significant architectural leap over the 9300+'s 3.4 GHz Cortex-X4. This, combined with the 3nm process, should translate to superior single-core performance and improved power efficiency. The X200s also benefits from a more diverse core configuration (1xX925, 3xX4, 4xA720) compared to the 14T Pro’s (1xX4, 3xX4, 4xA720). While both utilize LPDDR5x RAM, the X200s’ chipset advantage will likely result in smoother multitasking and faster app loading times.

Battery Life

The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 120W wired charging is a standout feature, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. This is significantly faster than the vivo X200s’ 90W charging. While the X200s offers 40W wireless charging, the 14T Pro’s 50W wireless charging is also competitive, reaching 100% in 45 minutes. The 14T Pro’s active use battery score of 12:32h demonstrates solid endurance. The X200s’ battery capacity is currently unknown, but the more efficient Dimensity 9400+ could potentially offset a smaller battery size. However, the 14T Pro’s charging speed provides a significant convenience advantage.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo X200s if you demand the absolute best CPU performance for demanding tasks like video editing, high-end gaming, or running complex applications. Its newer chipset architecture offers a performance edge. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you prioritize rapid charging, a consistently bright display, and a well-rounded experience without sacrificing performance – it’s the pragmatic choice for power users who don’t want to be tethered to a charger.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Dimensity 9400+ in the vivo X200s noticeably outperform the 9300+ in graphically intensive games?
While both chipsets are powerful, the Dimensity 9400+'s newer GPU architecture and higher clock speeds should translate to a measurable performance increase in demanding games. Expect higher frame rates and potentially better sustained performance during extended gaming sessions, though thermal management will play a crucial role.
❓ How does the 120W charging of the Xiaomi 14T Pro impact long-term battery health compared to the 90W charging of the X200s?
While faster charging is convenient, it can generate more heat, potentially accelerating battery degradation over time. However, modern smartphones employ sophisticated charging algorithms to mitigate this effect. The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s charging system includes features like PD3.0 and QC4, which optimize charging speed and minimize heat. The difference in long-term battery health is likely to be minimal for typical usage patterns.
❓ Does the Xiaomi 14T Pro support features like DisplayPort Alt Mode for video output?
The Xiaomi 14T Pro's support for DisplayPort Alt Mode is not explicitly stated in the provided specifications. However, many Xiaomi flagships include this feature, allowing for direct connection to external displays via USB-C. Checking official documentation or user reports is recommended to confirm compatibility.