vivo X200s vs Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and battery life, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, coupled with a measured 12:47h active use battery score, provides a more consistent and reliable experience, despite the X200s’ impressive peak CPU clock speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X200s | Oppo Find X7 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 25, 26, 28A, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 21 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 25 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 5000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired 40W wireless Reverse wired | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6200 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Silver, Mint, Purple | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown |
| Models | V2458A | PHY110, PHY120 |
| Price | About 510 EUR | $ 546.64 |
vivo X200s
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance with Dimensity 9400+
- 3nm process could offer improved efficiency (though not guaranteed)
- 90W wired charging is still very fast
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- Battery life data currently unavailable, posing a risk of lower endurance
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
- Excellent battery life (12:47h active use)
- Faster 100W wired charging
- Thermally efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset
- Slightly lower peak CPU clock speed compared to X200s
- 4nm process is less cutting-edge than X200s' 3nm
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra boasts a measured peak brightness of 1165 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the X200s, for which brightness data is unavailable. While both likely employ high-refresh-rate AMOLED panels, the X7 Ultra’s brightness advantage is a tangible benefit for outdoor use. Details regarding panel technology (LTPO) and color accuracy are currently missing for both devices, but given their flagship status, both are expected to deliver excellent color reproduction and smooth scrolling.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are absent, but both phones are expected to feature advanced camera systems. The focus should be on sensor size and image processing. Without specific details, it’s difficult to declare a winner. However, Oppo’s history with camera innovation (particularly with its MariSilicon X NPU) suggests a strong emphasis on computational photography and image quality. The X200s will likely leverage Mediatek’s image signal processor, but Oppo’s established expertise gives it a potential edge.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X200s utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, built on a 3nm process, featuring a Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.73 GHz. This is paired with three Cortex-X4 cores at 3.3 GHz and four Cortex-A720 cores at 2.4 GHz. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra, however, employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm), with a Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.3 GHz, three Cortex-A720 cores at 3.2 GHz, two Cortex-A720 cores at 3.0 GHz, and two Cortex-A520 cores at 2.3 GHz. While the X200s has a higher clocked prime core, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s 4nm process and optimized core configuration likely translate to better sustained performance and thermal management. The X200s’ 3nm node *should* offer efficiency gains, but the architectural differences and Qualcomm’s optimization are significant.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra demonstrates a clear advantage in battery performance with a reported 12:47h active use score. While the X200s’ battery capacity is unknown, the X7 Ultra’s score is a significant indicator of real-world endurance. Furthermore, the X7 Ultra supports 100W wired charging (0-100% in 26 minutes) and 50W wireless charging, while the X200s offers 90W wired and 40W wireless. The faster wired charging of the X7 Ultra, combined with its longer battery life, makes it the more convenient option for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X200s if you prioritize raw CPU power and are willing to potentially manage thermal throttling during extended, demanding tasks. Its Dimensity 9400+ offers a theoretical performance edge. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you value a balanced experience with excellent battery life, faster charging (100W vs 90W), and a proven, thermally efficient chipset for consistent performance across all workloads.