vivo X200s vs Honor Magic6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and future-proofing, the vivo X200s, with its Dimensity 9400+ chipset, is the clear winner. However, the Honor Magic6 Pro delivers a more balanced package with significantly longer battery life and a brighter display, making it ideal for everyday users and content consumers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X200s | Honor Magic6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 25, 26, 28A, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 21 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 25 | Available. Released 2024, January 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (NanoCrystal Shield), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 160 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 162.5 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 225 g or 229 g (7.94 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | NanoCrystal Shield |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 5000 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.4-2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 180 MP, f/2.6, (periscope telephoto), 1/1.49", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR, 10-bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.93", 0.6µm, AF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired 40W wireless Reverse wired | 80W wired 66W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6200 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 5600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Silver, Mint, Purple | Black, Green, Blue, Purple, White |
| Models | V2458A | BVL-AN16, BVL-N49 |
| Price | About 510 EUR | € 455.54 / $ 899.00 / £ 598.99 |
vivo X200s
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance with Dimensity 9400+
- Faster wired charging (90W)
- Cutting-edge chipset architecture
- Battery life likely inferior to Magic6 Pro
- Display brightness potentially lower than Magic6 Pro
- Thermal management needs to be assessed
Honor Magic6 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (14:06h active use)
- Significantly brighter display (1578 nits)
- Efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset
- Slower wired charging (80W)
- Potentially lower peak CPU performance
- Chipset is a generation behind the X200s' core design
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1578 nits, making it exceptionally visible outdoors. While the X200s’ display specs are not provided, the Magic6 Pro’s brightness advantage is substantial. The Magic6 Pro’s panel likely utilizes LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, contributing to power efficiency. The X200s’ display quality will be crucial to assess in a full review, but the Magic6 Pro sets a high bar for outdoor visibility and power saving.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, both phones are expected to feature high-end camera systems. The focus should be on sensor size, optical image stabilization (OIS), and image processing algorithms. The presence or absence of a dedicated telephoto lens with significant optical zoom will be a key differentiator. Image samples will be crucial to assess the real-world performance and color science of each device.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo X200s features the Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3nm) with a unique core configuration – 1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925, 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720. This contrasts with the Honor Magic6 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) with 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520. The Dimensity 9400+'s Cortex-X925 core is a newer, potentially more efficient design than the X4 in the Snapdragon, suggesting a performance edge. However, the 4nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 may offer better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling under sustained load. The X200s’ architecture suggests a focus on peak performance, while the Magic6 Pro aims for sustained, efficient power.
Battery Life
The Honor Magic6 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery life, achieving an active use score of 14:06h. The X200s’ battery capacity is not specified, but the Magic6 Pro’s longevity is a significant benefit. While the X200s offers faster wired charging at 90W compared to the Magic6 Pro’s 80W, the difference is unlikely to offset the Magic6 Pro’s superior battery capacity. Both phones support wireless charging, with the X200s offering 40W versus the Magic6 Pro’s 66W, and both offer reverse charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X200s if you demand the absolute fastest Android performance for demanding tasks like video editing, gaming, and heavy multitasking. You'll benefit from the cutting-edge Dimensity 9400+ and its potential for sustained performance. Buy the Honor Magic6 Pro if you prioritize all-day battery life, a vibrant and easily viewable display, and a more refined, balanced user experience. It’s the better choice for those who value longevity and usability over raw horsepower.