vivo X200s vs Google Pixel 8 Pro: A Flagship Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and charging speed, the vivo X200s emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9400+ chipset and 90W charging offer a clear advantage. However, the Pixel 8 Pro’s superior camera software and long-term software support make it the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those deeply invested in the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X200s | Google Pixel 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - G1MNW |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 25, 26, 28A, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G1MNW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 21 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 25 | Available. Released 2023, October 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1344 x 2992 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~489 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 5000 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Multi-zone Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.0, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) | 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired 40W wireless Reverse wired | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless Bypass charging |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6200 mAh | Li-Ion 5050 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Silver, Mint, Purple | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Mint |
| Models | V2458A | GC3VE, G1MNW |
| Price | About 510 EUR | € 362.00 / $ 289.97 / £ 329.95 / ₹ 54,999 |
vivo X200s
- Significantly faster processor with Dimensity 9400+
- Ultra-fast 90W wired charging
- Potential for superior gaming performance
- Camera performance is currently unknown
- Software update policy may be less consistent than Google
Google Pixel 8 Pro
- Exceptional camera quality and computational photography
- Guaranteed software updates for 7 years
- Seamless integration with Google services
- Slower processor compared to Dimensity 9400+
- Slower 30W wired charging
Display Comparison
The Pixel 8 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1600 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the X200s’ display specifications are currently unavailable, vivo typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The Pixel 8 Pro’s LTPO technology allows for a variable refresh rate, optimizing battery life. The Pixel 8 Pro’s display is likely to have superior color accuracy and calibration, given Google’s focus on display quality. The absence of detailed display specs for the X200s makes a definitive comparison difficult, but the Pixel 8 Pro currently holds an advantage.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 8 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s advanced image processing algorithms. While the X200s’ camera specifications are not detailed, the Pixel 8 Pro’s strengths lie in its software optimization, delivering consistently excellent results in various lighting conditions. The Pixel 8 Pro’s video capabilities are also top-tier, with features like Cinematic Pan and Video Boost. The X200s will need a compelling camera system to compete, but the Pixel 8 Pro’s established reputation and software advantages give it a significant lead. The Pixel 8 Pro’s focus on AI-powered features like Best Take further enhances its photographic capabilities.
Performance
The vivo X200s’ Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3nm) chipset, with its Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.73 GHz, is architecturally superior to the Pixel 8 Pro’s Google Tensor G3 (4nm). The Dimensity 9400+’s newer CPU cores and more efficient 3nm process should translate to significantly higher CPU and GPU performance. The Tensor G3’s nona-core configuration (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3, 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715, 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) prioritizes AI tasks, but lags behind in raw processing power. The X200s is expected to excel in demanding games and applications, while the Pixel 8 Pro focuses on intelligent features like Magic Eraser and real-time translation. The X200s likely utilizes faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing its performance edge.
Battery Life
The Pixel 8 Pro achieves an impressive 11:14h of active use, and an endurance rating of 90 hours, demonstrating excellent battery life. The vivo X200s’ battery capacity is unknown, but its 90W wired charging significantly surpasses the Pixel 8 Pro’s 30W charging. The X200s can likely achieve a full charge in under 40 minutes, while the Pixel 8 Pro takes around 30 minutes to reach 50%. The X200s also offers 40W wireless charging and reverse wired charging, providing greater flexibility. While the Pixel 8 Pro’s battery life is commendable, the X200s’ faster charging speeds offer a more convenient experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X200s if you need uncompromising processing power for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and value incredibly fast charging. Buy the Google Pixel 8 Pro if you prioritize computational photography, seamless integration with Google services, and guaranteed software updates for years to come. The Pixel 8 Pro is the better choice for users who value a polished, AI-driven experience.