vivo X200 vs Xiaomi 14T Pro: A Deep Dive into Mediatek's Flagship Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw processing power and sustained performance, the vivo X200 edges out the Xiaomi 14T Pro thanks to its Dimensity 9400 chipset. However, the 14T Pro’s significantly faster 120W charging and brighter display make it a compelling alternative for those valuing convenience and visual experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X200 | Xiaomi 14T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 14 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 19 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back or fiber-reinforced plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g or 202 g (6.95 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Alpha | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Si/C Li-Ion 5800 mAh (Global)· Li-Ion 5220 mAh (Austria) | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Natural Green (Aurora Green), Cosmos Black, Blue, White, Titanium | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | V2415A, V2405A, V2415 | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | About 1030 EUR | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR | 1.00 W/kg (head) 0.78 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo X200
- Superior CPU performance with Dimensity 9400
- Longer battery life in active use
- Potentially better thermal management due to 3nm process
- Slower charging speed (90W vs 120W)
- Lower peak display brightness
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Faster 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- PD3.0 and QC4 charging support for wider compatibility
- Shorter battery life in active use
- Less powerful CPU compared to Dimensity 9400
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 14T Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching 1228 nits compared to the vivo X200’s 1563 nits. While the X200 has a higher peak brightness, the difference in real-world usage may be less noticeable. Both displays likely utilize AMOLED technology, but the X200’s higher brightness could translate to better HDR content viewing. The absence of refresh rate data for both devices makes a direct comparison difficult, but both are expected to offer at least 120Hz for smooth scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the focus should be on the main sensor and image processing. Both brands are known for their computational photography prowess. The absence of sensor size data makes it difficult to assess low-light performance. The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s inclusion of features like OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) would be a significant advantage for video recording and handheld photography. We can assume both phones will offer a versatile camera system, but the X200’s newer chipset may provide more advanced image processing capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X200’s Dimensity 9400, built on a 3nm process, features a Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.63 GHz, alongside three Cortex-X4 cores at 3.3 GHz and four Cortex-A720 cores at 2.4 GHz. This configuration is expected to deliver superior performance compared to the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s Dimensity 9300+, which uses a Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.4 GHz, three more Cortex-X4 cores at 2.85 GHz, and four Cortex-A720 cores at 2.0 GHz. The 3nm node of the Dimensity 9400 should also offer improved thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling under sustained load. The 9300+’s 4nm process is still efficient, but the X200 has a clear architectural advantage.
Battery Life
The vivo X200 achieves an active use battery score of 14:51h, while the Xiaomi 14T Pro manages 12:32h. This suggests the X200 offers better battery endurance, likely due to the more efficient Dimensity 9400 chipset. However, the 14T Pro compensates with significantly faster charging: 120W wired, capable of a full charge in just 19 minutes, plus 50W wireless charging. The X200 offers 90W wired charging, which is still fast, but noticeably slower. The 14T Pro’s charging speed is a major convenience factor, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X200 if you need the absolute best CPU performance for demanding tasks like video editing, gaming, or heavy multitasking. Its Dimensity 9400 offers a clear advantage in processing power. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you prioritize fast charging, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a more established ecosystem of features like wireless charging and PD3.0 support.