vivo X200 vs Oppo Find X7: A Deep Dive into Mediatek's Flagship Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and battery life, the vivo X200 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 9400 chipset, built on a 3nm process, offers a performance edge and improved efficiency, while the 14:51h active use score demonstrates excellent endurance. However, the Oppo Find X7's faster 100W charging is a compelling advantage for those who value speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X200 | Oppo Find X7 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 - International | 1, 3, 4, 5 , 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 14 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 19 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back or fiber-reinforced plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 74.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) | 162.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm or 9.0 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g or 202 g (6.95 oz) | 202 g or 206 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Alpha | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2300 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 3x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired Reverse wired | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Si/C Li-Ion 5800 mAh (Global)· Li-Ion 5220 mAh (Austria) | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Natural Green (Aurora Green), Cosmos Black, Blue, White, Titanium | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown, Purple |
| Models | V2415A, V2405A, V2415 | PHZ110 |
| Price | About 1030 EUR | About 520 EUR |
| SAR | 1.00 W/kg (head) 0.78 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo X200
- Superior chipset performance (Dimensity 9400)
- Longer battery life (14:51h active use)
- Higher peak display brightness (1563 nits)
- Slower charging than Oppo Find X7
- Camera specs currently unknown
Oppo Find X7
- Faster 100W wired charging
- PD charging support
- Potentially excellent color accuracy (Oppo's strength)
- Less efficient chipset (4nm vs 3nm)
- Likely lower sustained performance
Display Comparison
The vivo X200 boasts a display capable of reaching a measured 1563 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Oppo Find X7’s display specs are not provided, Oppo typically prioritizes color accuracy and calibration. The X200’s brightness advantage is significant, particularly for outdoor use. Without knowing the panel technology (LTPO or not) of the Find X7, it’s difficult to assess power efficiency, but the X200’s brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Unfortunately, detailed camera specifications are absent for both devices. However, given both brands’ history, we can expect high-quality camera systems. The focus will likely be on computational photography and image processing algorithms. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s impossible to definitively declare a winner. We anticipate both phones will feature advanced features like OIS and multi-frame processing, but the X200’s potential for better image signal processing due to the more advanced chipset could give it a slight edge.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X200’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400, fabricated on a 3nm process, features a unique CPU configuration: 1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925, 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720. This contrasts with the Oppo Find X7’s Dimensity 9300, built on a 4nm node, with 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720. The 3nm process of the 9400 should translate to better thermal efficiency and potentially higher sustained performance, as it generates less heat under load. The X925 core in the X200 is also a newer, more efficient design than the X4 found in the Find X7. While both utilize LPDDR5x RAM (assumed), the chipset difference is the defining factor.
Battery Life
The vivo X200 achieves an impressive 14:51h of active use, indicating excellent battery endurance. The Oppo Find X7 compensates with faster charging: 100W wired, capable of reaching 50% in 10 minutes and 100% in 26 minutes. The X200 offers 90W wired charging with reverse wired charging. While the Find X7’s charging speed is quicker, the X200’s longer battery life provides a more substantial benefit for users who don’t want to constantly reach for a charger. The 3nm process of the Dimensity 9400 likely contributes to the X200’s superior battery performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X200 if you need a phone that excels in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and you prioritize long-lasting battery life. Its Dimensity 9400 chipset and efficient power management make it ideal for power users. Buy the Oppo Find X7 if you prefer a faster charging experience and are willing to trade a small amount of sustained performance for quicker top-ups. It's a great choice for users who frequently find themselves needing a rapid battery boost.