vivo X200 Ultra vs. Sony Xperia 1 VII: A Battle of Speed and Stamina
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and consistent performance, the Sony Xperia 1 VII emerges as the winner. Its exceptional 43:30h endurance and optimized thermal management outweigh the vivo X200 Ultra’s faster charging, making it the more practical choice for demanding users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X200 Ultra | Sony Xperia 1 VII |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 21 | 2025, May 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 29 | Available. Released 2025, June 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 76.8 x 8.7 mm (6.42 x 3.02 x 0.34 in) | 162 x 74 x 8.2 mm (6.38 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 229 g or 232 g (8.08 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Armor glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 830 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, 35mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, gimbal OIS 200 MP, f/2.3, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 3.4:1 (optional add-on zoom lens: f/2.3, 200mm, 2.35x optical zoom, Zeiss optics) 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS | 48 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.35", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.3, 85mm (telephoto), f/3.5, 170mm (telephoto), 1/3.5", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, 3.5x-7.1x continuous optical zoom, OIS, 4cm macro @ 120mm, no AF 48 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit Log, HDR10+ | 4K@24/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 12 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 6.0, A2DP, LE Audio, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD, PPS, QC, UFCS 40W wireless Reverse wired Reverse wireless | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Red | Moss Green, Orchid Purple, Slate Black |
| Models | V2454A, V2454DA | XQ-FS54, XQFS54EUKCG.GC, XQFS54EUKCV.GC, XQFS54EUKCB.GC, PDX256 |
| Price | About 780 EUR | € 1,338.99 / $ 1,394.99 / £ 1,149.94 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 43:30h endurance, 1400 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class B (181 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class D |
vivo X200 Ultra
- Blazing-fast 90W wired charging
- High peak display brightness (1816 nits)
- Potentially higher peak performance for short bursts
- Shorter battery life (13:36h active use)
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- Battery longevity (charge cycles) not specified
Sony Xperia 1 VII
- Exceptional battery life (43:30h endurance, 15:32h active use)
- Long battery lifespan (1400 charge cycles)
- Optimized thermal management for sustained performance
- Slower charging speed (30W wired)
- Lower peak display brightness (1475 nits)
- May prioritize stability over peak performance
Display Comparison
Both devices feature excellent displays driven by the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s ISP, but differ in peak brightness and endurance. The vivo X200 Ultra reaches a measured 1816 nits, while the Sony Xperia 1 VII achieves 1475 nits. While the X200 Ultra is brighter, the difference is unlikely to be noticeable in most real-world scenarios. The Xperia 1 VII’s display benefits from Sony’s expertise in display technology, potentially offering more accurate color reproduction, though this requires independent calibration testing. Neither specification details refresh rate or panel type, but both are expected to be high-quality OLED panels.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, both manufacturers have a strong reputation for image quality. The Xperia 1 VII benefits from Sony’s decades of camera sensor expertise, and its image processing tends towards natural colors and high dynamic range. The X200 Ultra, based on vivo’s marketing, likely emphasizes computational photography and vibrant colors. The absence of sensor size information makes it difficult to assess low-light performance, but Sony’s larger sensor history suggests an advantage in this area. We can assume both will offer advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS) and 8K video recording.
Performance
Both the vivo X200 Ultra and the Sony Xperia 1 VII are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M). This means raw processing power will be nearly identical. The key differentiator will be thermal management. While both will likely employ advanced cooling solutions, Sony’s history suggests a more conservative approach to sustained performance, prioritizing stability over peak clock speeds. The X200 Ultra, given vivo’s gaming focus, may push the chipset harder, potentially leading to more noticeable throttling during extended gaming sessions. RAM specifications are missing, but both are expected to utilize LPDDR5x for fast memory access.
Battery Life
The battery performance is where these phones truly diverge. The Sony Xperia 1 VII boasts an astounding 43:30h endurance and 1400 charge cycles, indicating exceptional battery longevity and optimized power management. In active use, it achieves 15:32h. The vivo X200 Ultra, while still respectable, offers 13:36h of active use. The X200 Ultra compensates with significantly faster charging: 90W wired, 40W wireless, and reverse charging capabilities, allowing for a full charge in a fraction of the time compared to the Xperia 1 VII’s 30W wired charging (50% in 30 minutes) and 15W wireless. The Xperia 1 VII’s longevity, however, reduces the need for frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X200 Ultra if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds (90W wired, 40W wireless) and prioritize peak performance for short bursts, like gaming or video editing. Buy the Sony Xperia 1 VII if you value exceptional battery life, a more balanced thermal profile for sustained performance, and a cinematic multimedia experience. The Xperia 1 VII is ideal for users who dislike frequent charging and demand reliability throughout the day.