vivo X200 Ultra vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and charging speed, the vivo X200 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite, coupled with 90W charging, provides a noticeable edge. However, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra remains a compelling choice with its slightly longer battery life and established software ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X200 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 21 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 29 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Corning Gorilla Armor), glass back (Corning Gorilla Armor), titanium frame (grade 2) |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 76.8 x 8.7 mm (6.42 x 3.02 x 0.34 in) | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | 229 g or 232 g (8.08 oz) | 232 g or 233 g (8.18 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Armor glass | Corning Gorilla Armor |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~505 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 113.5 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, 4500 nits (peak) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, 35mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, gimbal OIS 200 MP, f/2.3, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 3.4:1 (optional add-on zoom lens: f/2.3, 200mm, 2.35x optical zoom, Zeiss optics) 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit Log, HDR10+ | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD, PPS, QC, UFCS 40W wireless Reverse wired Reverse wireless | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Red | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange |
| Models | V2454A, V2454DA | SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS, SM-S928U, SM-S928U1, SM-S928W, SM-S928N, SM-S9280, SM-S928E, SM-S928E/DS |
| Price | About 780 EUR | $ 514.94 / C$ 929.99 / £ 630.00 / € 658.53 / ₹ 84,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.26 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
vivo X200 Ultra
- Faster Snapdragon 8 Elite processor
- Significantly faster 90W charging
- Higher peak display brightness
- Slightly shorter battery life in active use
- Camera specifications currently unknown
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Slightly longer battery life
- Established software ecosystem and features
- Versatile camera system
- Slower charging speeds
- Less powerful processor (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3)
Display Comparison
Both devices boast exceptional displays, but the vivo X200 Ultra edges ahead with a measured peak brightness of 1816 nits compared to the S24 Ultra’s 1447 nits. While both likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, the higher peak brightness of the X200 Ultra translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. Samsung’s display is known for its color accuracy, but the X200 Ultra’s increased luminance provides a tangible benefit for outdoor usage.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are expected to deliver excellent camera performance, the context data focuses on the S24 Ultra’s general capabilities. The X200 Ultra’s camera specifications are currently unknown, but given vivo’s history, it’s likely to prioritize image quality and computational photography. The S24 Ultra’s strength lies in its versatility, offering a comprehensive suite of lenses and advanced features. Without specific sensor details for the X200 Ultra, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison, but the S24 Ultra’s established reputation for video recording and image stabilization gives it an advantage based on brand history.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X200 Ultra features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (SM8750-AB) built on a 3nm process, utilizing a unique octa-core configuration with Oryon V2 Phoenix cores clocked up to 4.32 GHz. This contrasts with the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (SM8650-AC) on a 4nm process, employing a more traditional 8-core setup. The 3nm node of the Snapdragon 8 Elite should offer improved power efficiency and thermal performance, potentially leading to sustained higher clock speeds during intensive workloads. The Oryon architecture is also designed for superior single-core performance, which benefits responsiveness and app launch times.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra demonstrates a slight edge in battery endurance with an active use score of 13:49h, compared to the vivo X200 Ultra’s 13:36h. However, the X200 Ultra compensates with significantly faster charging – 90W wired, 40W wireless – allowing for a full charge in a fraction of the time compared to the S24 Ultra’s 45W wired and 15W wireless charging. The X200 Ultra also supports reverse wired and wireless charging, a feature the S24 Ultra offers, but at a lower reverse wireless wattage (4.5W vs unspecified for the X200 Ultra).
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X200 Ultra if you need uncompromising processing power for demanding tasks like video editing or gaming, and value the fastest possible charging speeds. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra if you prefer a more polished software experience, a versatile camera system with extensive features, and a slightly longer-lasting battery for all-day use.