vivo X200 Ultra vs. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance

The vivo X200 Ultra arrives as a direct challenger to established flagship dominance, spearheaded by the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra. While the S23 Ultra has enjoyed a period of refinement, the X200 Ultra introduces Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, promising a leap in performance. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device truly reigns supreme.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing raw processing power and faster charging, the vivo X200 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and 90W charging offer a tangible advantage. However, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra remains a compelling choice for its mature software ecosystem and consistently excellent camera performance.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo X200 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
 -1, 7, 28, 41, 66, 71, 78, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA
Launch
Announced2025, April 212023, February 01
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, April 29Available. Released 2023, February 17
Body
BuildGlass front, glass back, aluminum frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame
Dimensions163.1 x 76.8 x 8.7 mm (6.42 x 3.02 x 0.34 in)163.4 x 78.1 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)
Weight229 g or 232 g (8.08 oz)234 g (8.25 oz)
 -IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) Stylus (Bluetooth integration, accelerometer, gyro)
Display
ProtectionArmor glassCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Resolution1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density)1440 x 3088 pixels, 19.3:9 ratio (~500 ppi density)
Size6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.8 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeLTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, 4500 nits (peak)Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1750 nits (peak)
 -Always-on display
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M)Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm)Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 830Adreno 740
OSAndroid 15, OriginOS 5Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM
 -UFS 4.0
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT importLaser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama
Quad-200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 10 MP, f/4.9, 230mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 10x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video
Single-12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), Dual Pixel PDAF
Triple50 MP, f/1.7, 35mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, gimbal OIS 200 MP, f/2.3, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 3.4:1 (optional add-on zoom lens: f/2.3, 200mm, 2.35x optical zoom, Zeiss optics) 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS-
Video8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit Log, HDR10+8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR, HDR10+
Single50 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -No
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 -32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 55.3, A2DP, LE
Infrared portYes-
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASSGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPortUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
 -Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) Ultra Wideband (UWB) support
Battery
Charging90W wired, PD, PPS, QC, UFCS 40W wireless Reverse wired Reverse wireless45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless
TypeSi/C Li-Ion 6000 mAhLi-Ion 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, Silver, RedPhantom Black, Green, Cream, Lavender, Graphite, Sky Blue, Lime, Red, BMW M Edition
ModelsV2454A, V2454DASM-S918B, SM-S918B/DS, SM-S918U, SM-S918U1, SM-S918W, SM-S918N, SM-S9180, SM-S918E, SM-S918E/DS
PriceAbout 780 EUR€ 549.90 / $ 454.99 / £ 433.00
SAR-1.12 W/kg (head)     0.92 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.96 W/kg (head)     1.40 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 126h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -25.6 LUFS (Very good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 1241531 (v9) GeekBench: 4927 (v5.1) GFXBench: 67fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo X200 Ultra

  • Significantly faster charging (90W wired, 40W wireless)
  • Potentially superior CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
  • Brighter display for better outdoor visibility

  • Software ecosystem less mature than Samsung’s
  • Camera performance currently unproven

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

  • Polished and feature-rich software experience
  • Established camera system with excellent image quality
  • Proven reliability and long-term software support

  • Slower charging speeds (45W wired, 15W wireless)
  • Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 8 Elite

Display Comparison

The vivo X200 Ultra boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1816 nits compared to the S23 Ultra’s 1274 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both displays feature infinite contrast ratios (nominal), the X200 Ultra’s higher peak brightness provides a more vibrant and impactful viewing experience. Both are likely to utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, though specific refresh rate ranges aren't provided. The S23 Ultra’s established display calibration and color accuracy are likely excellent, but the X200 Ultra’s brightness advantage is a significant differentiator.

Camera Comparison

Both devices are equipped for exceptional photo and video capture, but details are limited. The S23 Ultra is renowned for its versatile camera system, likely featuring a large main sensor and sophisticated image processing algorithms. The X200 Ultra’s camera specifications are currently unknown, but vivo’s history suggests a focus on computational photography and potentially a high-resolution main sensor. Without specific sensor sizes, apertures, or OIS details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, the S23 Ultra’s established reputation and software optimization give it a slight edge based on current market knowledge.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X200 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) utilizes a unique Oryon V2 Phoenix core configuration (2x4.32 GHz + 6x3.53 GHz) designed for peak performance. This contrasts with the S23 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) which employs a more traditional octa-core setup (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3, etc.). The 3nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Elite should offer improved power efficiency and thermal headroom, potentially leading to sustained performance during extended gaming sessions. While the S23 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is no slouch, the X200 Ultra is positioned to deliver a noticeable performance uplift, particularly in CPU-intensive tasks. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the X200 Ultra’s chipset advantage is the key factor.

Battery Life

Battery life is remarkably close, with the vivo X200 Ultra achieving 13:36h of active use compared to the S23 Ultra’s 13:24h. The S23 Ultra’s older endurance rating of 126h suggests similar real-world longevity. However, the X200 Ultra’s charging capabilities are significantly superior, offering 90W wired charging (with PD, PPS, QC, UFCS) and 40W wireless charging. The S23 Ultra is limited to 45W wired and 15W wireless. This means the X200 Ultra can replenish its battery much faster, a crucial advantage for power users. The X200 Ultra also offers reverse wired and wireless charging, a feature the S23 Ultra provides, but at a lower 4.5W for wireless reverse charging.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo X200 Ultra if you demand the absolute fastest Android performance available, frequently engage in demanding mobile gaming, and value incredibly rapid charging speeds. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra if you prioritize a polished software experience, a versatile camera system with established image processing, and a device with a proven track record of reliability and long-term support.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Elite in the X200 Ultra generate excessive heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8 Elite’s 3nm process is designed to improve thermal efficiency compared to the 4nm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. While demanding games will inevitably generate heat, the X200 Ultra should be better equipped to manage it, potentially reducing throttling and maintaining higher frame rates for longer periods. However, real-world testing is needed to confirm this.
❓ How does the 90W charging on the X200 Ultra compare to the 45W charging on the S23 Ultra in a typical use case?
The X200 Ultra’s 90W charging significantly reduces charging time. While the S23 Ultra reaches 65% in 30 minutes, the X200 Ultra is expected to achieve a full charge in a similar timeframe. This is a substantial benefit for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the difference in active use battery life (13:36h vs 13:24h) between the X200 Ultra and S23 Ultra practically noticeable?
The difference of 12 minutes in active use battery life is minimal and unlikely to be noticeable in everyday use. Both phones offer all-day battery life for most users. The X200 Ultra’s advantage lies in its much faster charging, allowing for quicker replenishment when needed.