vivo X200 Ultra vs. Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Head-to-Head Battle of Snapdragon Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the vivo X200 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, coupled with a slightly longer battery life, provides a noticeable edge. However, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s faster 100W charging and refined software experience make it a compelling alternative.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X200 Ultra | Oppo Find X7 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 21 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 29 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 76.8 x 8.7 mm (6.42 x 3.02 x 0.34 in) | 164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 229 g or 232 g (8.08 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Armor glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, 35mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, gimbal OIS 200 MP, f/2.3, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 3.4:1 (optional add-on zoom lens: f/2.3, 200mm, 2.35x optical zoom, Zeiss optics) 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit Log, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD, PPS, QC, UFCS 40W wireless Reverse wired Reverse wireless | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Red | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown |
| Models | V2454A, V2454DA | PHY110, PHY120 |
| Price | About 780 EUR | $ 546.64 |
vivo X200 Ultra
- Superior CPU and GPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Slightly longer battery life in active use
- Slower wired charging compared to Oppo
- Potential for higher price point
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
- Faster 100W wired charging for quicker top-ups
- Potentially more refined software experience (Oppo's ColorOS)
- Competitive performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Lower peak display brightness
- Shorter battery life in active use
Display Comparison
The vivo X200 Ultra boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1816 nits compared to the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s 1165 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates (though not explicitly stated), the X200 Ultra’s higher peak brightness is a tangible benefit for outdoor users. The impact of panel technology beyond brightness (color accuracy, viewing angles) is unknown without further testing, but the X200 Ultra’s advantage in peak luminance is clear.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, both phones are expected to feature high-end camera systems. The chipset’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) plays a crucial role, and the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s newer ISP could offer improvements in image processing speed and quality. The X200 Ultra’s potential for superior processing power could translate to better low-light performance and faster image capture. The absence of sensor details makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the X200 Ultra’s chipset advantage suggests a potential edge.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X200 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) features a unique octa-core configuration with Oryon V2 Phoenix cores clocked up to 4.32 GHz, promising substantial performance gains over the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm). The Gen 3 utilizes a more conventional Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.3 GHz. The 3nm process of the 8 Elite should also offer improved thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the Gen 3 is a powerhouse, the 8 Elite’s architecture and process node give the X200 Ultra a theoretical edge in sustained performance.
Battery Life
The vivo X200 Ultra delivers a slightly longer active use battery score of 13:36h compared to the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s 12:47h. This suggests better power efficiency, likely stemming from the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s 3nm process. While the Find X7 Ultra boasts faster 100W wired charging (claiming 100% in 26 minutes) compared to the X200 Ultra’s 90W, the X200 Ultra compensates with 40W wireless charging, exceeding the Find X7 Ultra’s 50W. The X200 Ultra also offers reverse wired and wireless charging, a feature the Find X7 Ultra only provides in wired form.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X200 Ultra if you demand the absolute best performance for demanding tasks like video editing, high-end gaming, and multitasking. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite offers a clear advantage in CPU and GPU power. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you prioritize a balanced experience with faster charging speeds and a potentially more polished software experience, even if it means sacrificing a small amount of peak performance.