vivo X200 Ultra vs Honor Magic6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance

The vivo X200 Ultra and Honor Magic6 Pro represent the pinnacle of Android flagship development, both powered by Qualcomm’s latest silicon. However, they diverge in chipset choice – the X200 Ultra opting for the cutting-edge Snapdragon 8 Elite while the Magic6 Pro utilizes the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. This comparison dissects these differences, alongside battery life, display prowess, and charging capabilities, to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the vivo X200 Ultra, with its Snapdragon 8 Elite, takes a slight edge. However, the Honor Magic6 Pro counters with superior battery life and a brighter display, making it the more practical choice for everyday use and media consumption.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo X200 Ultra Honor Magic6 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66LTE
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSASA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2025, April 212024, January 11
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, April 29Available. Released 2024, January 18
Body
BuildGlass front, glass back, aluminum frameGlass front (NanoCrystal Shield), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather)
Dimensions163.1 x 76.8 x 8.7 mm (6.42 x 3.02 x 0.34 in)162.5 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight229 g or 232 g (8.08 oz)225 g or 229 g (7.94 oz)
Display
ProtectionArmor glassNanoCrystal Shield
Resolution1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density)1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density)
Size6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeLTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, 4500 nits (peak)LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm)Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 830Adreno 750
OSAndroid 15, OriginOS 5Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT importLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple50 MP, f/1.7, 35mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, gimbal OIS 200 MP, f/2.3, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 3.4:1 (optional add-on zoom lens: f/2.3, 200mm, 2.35x optical zoom, Zeiss optics) 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS50 MP, f/1.4-2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 180 MP, f/2.6, (periscope telephoto), 1/1.49", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, AF
Video8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit Log, HDR10+4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR, 10-bit video
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR-
Single50 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.93", 0.6µm, AF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor)
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 55.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPortUSB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging90W wired, PD, PPS, QC, UFCS 40W wireless Reverse wired Reverse wireless80W wired 66W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired
TypeSi/C Li-Ion 6000 mAhSi/C Li-Ion 5600 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, Silver, RedBlack, Green, Blue, Purple, White
ModelsV2454A, V2454DABVL-AN16, BVL-N49
PriceAbout 780 EUR€ 455.54 / $ 899.00 / £ 598.99

vivo X200 Ultra

  • Potentially superior CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
  • Faster 90W wired charging
  • Reverse wired charging capability

  • Slightly shorter battery life
  • Potentially higher thermal output under sustained load

Honor Magic6 Pro

  • Longer battery life (14:06h active use)
  • Brighter display for outdoor visibility
  • Faster 66W wireless charging

  • Slower 80W wired charging
  • Potentially lower peak CPU performance

Display Comparison

The Honor Magic6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 1578 nits measured, compared to the vivo X200 Ultra’s 1816 nits. While the X200 Ultra has a higher peak brightness, the difference in real-world viewing is less pronounced. Both likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, though specifics are missing. The Magic6 Pro’s higher brightness is particularly beneficial for outdoor use, combating glare more effectively. Color accuracy and panel quality are assumed to be excellent on both, given their flagship status, but detailed calibration data is unavailable.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, both phones are expected to feature advanced camera systems. The focus should be on sensor size and image processing. The X200 Ultra’s brand positioning suggests a focus on image quality and potentially larger sensors. The Magic6 Pro, known for its computational photography, likely excels in dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of information on lens apertures and OIS systems prevents a deeper analysis.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X200 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) features an octa-core configuration with Oryon V2 Phoenix L and M cores clocked up to 4.32 GHz, promising exceptional CPU performance. The Honor Magic6 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) utilizes a more traditional core arrangement with a Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.3 GHz. The 3nm process of the 8 Elite should translate to better thermal efficiency and sustained performance under heavy load, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the Gen 3 is no slouch, the 8 Elite’s architectural advantages give the X200 Ultra a theoretical edge in CPU-intensive tasks.

Battery Life

The Honor Magic6 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery life, achieving 14:06 hours of active use compared to the vivo X200 Ultra’s 13:36 hours. This difference, while not massive, is significant for all-day users. The Magic6 Pro also supports 66W wireless charging, while the X200 Ultra offers a faster 40W wireless solution. The X200 Ultra compensates with 90W wired charging, significantly faster than the Magic6 Pro’s 80W, allowing for quicker top-ups. Both offer reverse wireless charging, but the X200 Ultra also includes reverse wired charging, adding versatility.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo X200 Ultra if you demand the absolute fastest Android performance, particularly for demanding games and applications, and are willing to trade some battery life for it. Buy the Honor Magic6 Pro if you prioritize all-day battery life, a stunningly bright display for outdoor visibility, and a more balanced overall experience without sacrificing flagship-level performance.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Elite in the vivo X200 Ultra get noticeably hotter than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s 3nm process aims for improved thermal efficiency, its higher clock speeds and performance potential could lead to increased heat generation under sustained load. The X200 Ultra’s cooling system will be crucial in mitigating this, but users should expect some degree of throttling during prolonged, demanding gaming.
❓ How does the 66W wireless charging on the Honor Magic6 Pro compare to the 40W wireless charging on the vivo X200 Ultra in terms of real-world charging time?
The Honor Magic6 Pro’s 66W wireless charging will significantly reduce charging times compared to the X200 Ultra’s 40W. Expect a faster wireless charge from 0-100% on the Magic6 Pro, potentially shaving off 30-45 minutes depending on battery level and ambient temperature.
❓ Is the difference in display brightness between the two phones noticeable in everyday use, or is it only apparent in direct sunlight?
The difference in brightness is most noticeable in direct sunlight, where the Honor Magic6 Pro’s higher peak brightness will provide a clearer and more readable display. However, even in indoor environments, the Magic6 Pro’s display will appear slightly more vibrant and punchy due to its higher output.