vivo X200 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 8 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Android
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and rapid charging, the vivo X200 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and 90W charging significantly outperform the Pixel 8 Pro’s Tensor G3 and 30W charging. However, the Pixel 8 Pro remains a compelling choice for those deeply invested in Google’s ecosystem and camera software.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X200 Ultra | Google Pixel 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - G1MNW |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G1MNW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 21 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 29 | Available. Released 2023, October 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 76.8 x 8.7 mm (6.42 x 3.02 x 0.34 in) | 162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 229 g or 232 g (8.08 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Armor glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) | 1344 x 2992 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~489 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Multi-zone Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, 35mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, gimbal OIS 200 MP, f/2.3, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 3.4:1 (optional add-on zoom lens: f/2.3, 200mm, 2.35x optical zoom, Zeiss optics) 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.0, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit Log, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD, PPS, QC, UFCS 40W wireless Reverse wired Reverse wireless | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless Bypass charging |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 5050 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Red | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Mint |
| Models | V2454A, V2454DA | GC3VE, G1MNW |
| Price | About 780 EUR | € 362.00 / $ 289.97 / £ 329.95 / ₹ 54,999 |
vivo X200 Ultra
- Significantly faster charging (90W)
- Superior CPU and GPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Longer battery life in active use
- Camera specifications are unknown
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel
Google Pixel 8 Pro
- Exceptional computational photography and image processing
- Seamless integration with Google’s ecosystem
- Guaranteed long-term software support
- Slower charging speed (30W)
- Less powerful chipset (Tensor G3)
- Shorter battery life in active use
Display Comparison
The vivo X200 Ultra boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1816 nits compared to the Pixel 8 Pro’s 1600 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates (not specified in the data), the X200 Ultra’s higher peak brightness provides a noticeable advantage for HDR content consumption. The absence of PWM frequency data prevents a definitive statement on flicker, but both are expected to utilize modern techniques to minimize eye strain.
Camera Comparison
The provided data focuses on the presence of a camera on the Pixel 8 Pro, but lacks specifics. However, Google’s strength lies in its computational photography, leveraging AI to enhance image quality. The X200 Ultra’s camera specifications are also missing, making a direct sensor comparison impossible. Assuming a flagship-level sensor, the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) will likely offer fast processing speeds and advanced features. The Pixel 8 Pro’s video capabilities are well-regarded, but the X200 Ultra’s chipset could potentially offer comparable or even superior video encoding performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X200 Ultra’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) features an octa-core configuration with Oryon V2 Phoenix cores – 2x4.32 GHz and 6x3.53 GHz – promising substantial performance gains. This contrasts with the Google Pixel 8 Pro’s Google Tensor G3 (4nm) nona-core CPU (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3, 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715, 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510). The Snapdragon 8 Elite’s newer architecture and 3nm process should deliver superior CPU and GPU performance, alongside improved thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The X200 Ultra is likely to excel in graphically intensive games and demanding applications.
Battery Life
The vivo X200 Ultra demonstrates superior battery endurance with an active use score of 13:36h, exceeding the Pixel 8 Pro’s 11:14h. While the Pixel 8 Pro’s older endurance rating of 90h provides a different metric, the real-world active use score is more relevant. The X200 Ultra also features significantly faster charging at 90W wired, 40W wireless, and reverse charging capabilities, compared to the Pixel 8 Pro’s 30W wired and 23W wireless. The X200 Ultra can likely achieve a full charge in under 40 minutes, while the Pixel 8 Pro takes considerably longer.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X200 Ultra if you need uncompromising processing power for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging. Buy the Google Pixel 8 Pro if you prioritize a seamless software experience, exceptional computational photography, and long-term software support from Google, even if it means sacrificing some raw horsepower.