vivo X200 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, coupled with 120W charging, offers a more consistently powerful experience. However, the vivo X200 Pro’s impressive battery life and potentially more efficient chipset are compelling alternatives.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X200 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - China | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - India | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 14 | 2023, November 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 19 | Available. Released 2023, November 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back or fiber-reinforced plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 76 x 8.2 mm or 8.5 mm | 160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm (6.33 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 223 g or 228 g (7.87 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Scratch/drop-resistant glass (Armor Glass) | - |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 4500 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 200 MP, f/2.7, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 2.7:1 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, (ultrawide) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Log, Dolby Vision HDR | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired 30W wireless Reverse wireless Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 18 min |
| Type | · Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh (Global)· Li-Ion 5200 mAh (Austria, Hungary, Germany) | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmos Black, Titanium Grey, Blue, White | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Lamborgini Green, Lamborgini Yellow |
| Models | V2413, V2405A, V2405DA | 23117RK66C |
| Price | £ 969.00 / ₹ 94,999 | About 430 EUR |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo X200 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (15:09h active use)
- Potentially more efficient 3nm Dimensity 9400 chipset
- Faster CPU clock speed (Cortex-X925)
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Slower wired charging (90W vs 120W)
- Camera specs unknown, making comparison difficult
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging (18 min to 100%)
- Proven Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance
- PD3.0 and QC3+ charging compatibility
- Likely optimized gaming performance
- Battery life likely shorter than X200 Pro
- 4nm process may run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
The vivo X200 Pro boasts a peak brightness of 1881 nits, suggesting excellent outdoor visibility. While the Redmi K70 Pro’s display specs aren’t provided, Xiaomi typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The X200 Pro’s brightness advantage is significant, potentially offering a more vibrant experience in direct sunlight. Without knowing the K70 Pro’s panel technology (LTPO or not), it’s difficult to assess power efficiency differences, but the X200 Pro’s brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Unfortunately, camera specifications are absent from the provided data. Given both phones’ flagship status, we can expect high-quality camera systems. However, without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a meaningful comparison is impossible. We can assume both will feature advanced image processing algorithms, but the X200 Pro’s brand positioning suggests a potential focus on color science and portrait photography, while Xiaomi often prioritizes dynamic range and detail.
Performance
The core of the battle lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is a known quantity, delivering exceptional performance. The vivo X200 Pro, however, features the Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm). This smaller node *should* translate to improved power efficiency and thermal management. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s CPU configuration (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4) is slightly more conservative than the X200 Pro’s (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925), potentially offering a performance edge in single-core tasks. The X200 Pro’s additional X4 cores (3 vs 3) and A720 cores (4 vs 2) suggest a potential advantage in multi-threaded workloads, but real-world performance will depend on software optimization.
Battery Life
The vivo X200 Pro shines in battery endurance, achieving 15:09 hours of active use. The Redmi K70 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 120W wired charging (and support for PD3.0/QC3+) is significantly faster than the X200 Pro’s 90W charging. The K70 Pro can reach 100% charge in just 18 minutes, a substantial advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups. While the X200 Pro offers 30W wireless and reverse charging, the K70 Pro’s charging speed is a clear differentiator.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X200 Pro if you prioritize all-day battery life and potentially benefit from the Dimensity 9400’s architectural advantages in specific workloads. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro if you demand the fastest possible charging speeds, consistently high frame rates in gaming, and a proven track record of Snapdragon performance optimization.