vivo X200 Pro vs iQOO 12 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and battery life, the vivo X200 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9400 chipset, coupled with a measured 15:09h active use score, offers a compelling advantage. However, gamers and power users may lean towards the iQOO 12 Pro's Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and faster 120W charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X200 Pro | vivo iQOO 12 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - China | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - India | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 14 | 2023, November 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 19 | Available. Released 2023, November 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back or fiber-reinforced plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 76 x 8.2 mm or 8.5 mm | 164.6 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 223 g or 228 g (7.87 oz) | 205 g or 210 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Scratch/drop-resistant glass (Armor Glass) | - |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 200 MP, f/2.7, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 2.7:1 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, ulti-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Log, Dolby Vision HDR | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired 30W wireless Reverse wireless Reverse wired | 120W wired 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | · Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh (Global)· Li-Ion 5200 mAh (Austria, Hungary, Germany) | 5100 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmos Black, Titanium Grey, Blue, White | Black, Red, White (BMW M branding) |
| Models | V2413, V2405A, V2405DA | V2329A |
| Price | £ 969.00 / ₹ 94,999 | About 650 EUR |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo X200 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (15:09h active use)
- Brighter display (1881 nits)
- Potentially better thermal management due to 3nm Dimensity 9400
- Slower wired charging (90W)
- Less established gaming ecosystem compared to Snapdragon
vivo iQOO 12 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset
- Strong gaming performance
- Potentially shorter battery life
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The vivo X200 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1881 nits, making it ideal for outdoor use. While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates (based on brand trends), the X200 Pro’s peak brightness is a clear advantage. Details regarding panel type (AMOLED vs. E6) and color accuracy are currently unavailable, but both are expected to deliver vibrant visuals. Bezels are likely comparable, given both phones target the premium segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) plays a crucial role. Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ISP is renowned for its image processing capabilities, particularly in low-light scenarios. The Dimensity 9400’s ISP is also advanced, but its performance relative to Qualcomm remains to be seen. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and OIS implementation makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the X200 Pro's potential for computational photography benefits from the more complex CPU core arrangement.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO 12 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is built for raw power, featuring a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz. The X200 Pro’s Dimensity 9400 (3nm) employs a more complex core configuration – a Cortex-X925 at 3.63 GHz, three Cortex-X4 cores at 3.3 GHz, and four Cortex-A720 cores at 2.4 GHz. The 3nm process of the Dimensity 9400 *should* translate to better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. The iQOO 12 Pro’s CPU configuration, while powerful, has a wider spread of core types, potentially impacting sustained performance. Both phones likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but specific speeds are unknown.
Battery Life
The vivo X200 Pro’s 15:09h active use score is a significant advantage, suggesting superior battery optimization. The iQOO 12 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging – 120W wired versus 90W on the X200 Pro. This means the iQOO 12 Pro can replenish its battery much quicker, but the X200 Pro will likely last longer on a single charge. Both offer wireless charging, with the iQOO 12 Pro at 50W being more potent than the X200 Pro’s 30W. Reverse wireless and wired charging are present on both, offering added convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X200 Pro if you need exceptional battery life, a brighter display for outdoor visibility (1881 nits), and value sustained performance over short bursts of peak power. Buy the vivo iQOO 12 Pro if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging speeds (120W), demand the highest possible gaming frame rates, and prefer Qualcomm's established ecosystem.