vivo X200 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and charging speed, the vivo X200 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9400 chipset and 90W charging significantly outperform the S24 Ultra. However, the Galaxy S24 Ultra’s refined software, camera versatility, and broader ecosystem support make it the more well-rounded choice for the average user.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X200 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - China | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - India | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 14 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 19 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back or fiber-reinforced plastic back | Glass front (Corning Gorilla Armor), glass back (Corning Gorilla Armor), titanium frame (grade 2) |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 76 x 8.2 mm or 8.5 mm | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | 223 g or 228 g (7.87 oz) | 232 g or 233 g (8.18 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Scratch/drop-resistant glass (Armor Glass) | Corning Gorilla Armor |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~505 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 113.5 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 4500 nits (peak) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 200 MP, f/2.7, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 2.7:1 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Log, Dolby Vision HDR | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired 30W wireless Reverse wireless Reverse wired | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | · Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh (Global)· Li-Ion 5200 mAh (Austria, Hungary, Germany) | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmos Black, Titanium Grey, Blue, White | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange |
| Models | V2413, V2405A, V2405DA | SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS, SM-S928U, SM-S928U1, SM-S928W, SM-S928N, SM-S9280, SM-S928E, SM-S928E/DS |
| Price | £ 969.00 / ₹ 94,999 | $ 514.94 / C$ 929.99 / £ 630.00 / € 658.53 / ₹ 84,999 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) | 1.26 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
vivo X200 Pro
- Faster chipset (Dimensity 9400)
- Significantly faster charging (90W)
- Brighter display (1881 nits)
- Software experience may be less refined
- Camera system details currently unknown
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Polished software experience (One UI)
- Versatile camera system
- Strong ecosystem integration
- Slower charging (45W)
- Less powerful chipset (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3)
Display Comparison
The vivo X200 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1881 nits compared to the Galaxy S24 Ultra’s 1447 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, the X200 Pro’s higher peak brightness provides a noticeable advantage for HDR content consumption. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, and color accuracy is expected to be excellent on both devices, though Samsung’s displays are often calibrated for more saturated colors.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are expected to deliver excellent image quality, the Galaxy S24 Ultra likely holds an edge in overall versatility. Samsung’s history of advanced image processing and multi-camera systems (details not provided in context) provides a broader range of shooting options. The X200 Pro’s camera specifications are currently unknown, but the focus should be on the main sensor size and aperture. The S24 Ultra’s camera system is known for its robust OIS and advanced video capabilities. Ignoring the typical 2MP macro lens found on many smartphones, the real comparison will be in the quality of the primary and ultrawide sensors, and the sophistication of the image processing algorithms.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X200 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400, built on a 3nm process, features a unique CPU configuration: 1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925, 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720. This contrasts with the Galaxy S24 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) with its 1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720, 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520. The Dimensity 9400’s newer Cortex-X925 core suggests a performance edge, particularly in single-core tasks. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized software and potentially better thermal management, mitigating throttling during sustained loads. Both utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the Dimensity 9400’s architecture may offer a slight advantage in memory bandwidth.
Battery Life
The vivo X200 Pro achieves an impressive 15:09h of active use, exceeding the Galaxy S24 Ultra’s 13:49h. This suggests better power efficiency despite the more powerful chipset. The X200 Pro’s 90W wired charging is a game-changer, offering significantly faster charging speeds than the S24 Ultra’s 45W charging (65% in 30 minutes). The X200 Pro also supports 30W wireless and reverse wireless charging, while the S24 Ultra offers 15W wireless (Qi) and 4.5W reverse wireless. The X200 Pro’s charging speed offsets any potential battery capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X200 Pro if you demand the absolute fastest processing speeds for demanding tasks like video editing or gaming, and if rapid charging is a priority. You’ll benefit from the latest chipset architecture and a significantly faster charging experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra if you value a polished software experience, a versatile camera system with extensive features, and seamless integration with the Samsung ecosystem. It’s the safer, more refined choice for everyday use and content creation.