vivo X200 Pro vs OnePlus 12R: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Flagship Androids
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and a brighter, more vibrant display, the vivo X200 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9400 chipset and 1881 nits peak brightness offer a noticeable advantage. However, the OnePlus 12R remains a compelling option for those seeking a balance of power and value, with its 100W charging and established software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X200 Pro | OnePlus 12R |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - China | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - India | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 14 | 2024, January 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 19 | Available. Released 2024, February 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back or fiber-reinforced plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 76 x 8.2 mm or 8.5 mm | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 223 g or 228 g (7.87 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Scratch/drop-resistant glass (Armor Glass) | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 200 MP, f/2.7, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 2.7:1 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Log, Dolby Vision HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired 30W wireless Reverse wireless Reverse wired | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | · Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh (Global)· Li-Ion 5200 mAh (Austria, Hungary, Germany) | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmos Black, Titanium Grey, Blue, White | Iron Gray, Cool Blue, Electric Violet, Sunset Dune |
| Models | V2413, V2405A, V2405DA | CPH2609, CPH2585, CPH2611 |
| Price | £ 969.00 / ₹ 94,999 | € 410.84 / $ 399.95 / £ 649.00 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
vivo X200 Pro
- Superior performance with Dimensity 9400
- Significantly brighter display (1881 nits)
- Versatile charging options (90W wired, 30W wireless, reverse charging)
- Software optimization may be less refined
- Potentially higher price point
OnePlus 12R
- Faster 100W wired charging (26 min full charge)
- Established and optimized OxygenOS software
- Competitive performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Dimmer display (1181 nits)
- Less advanced chipset compared to Dimensity 9400
Display Comparison
The vivo X200 Pro’s display is a clear standout, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1881 nits, significantly surpassing the OnePlus 12R’s 1181 nits. This translates to superior readability in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the X200 Pro’s higher brightness suggests a more advanced panel technology, potentially with a higher peak current capability. The absence of refresh rate data for both phones makes a direct comparison difficult, but the X200 Pro’s brightness advantage is undeniable for outdoor users and HDR content consumption.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the X200 Pro’s positioning as a flagship suggests a more sophisticated camera system. The chipset’s ISP capabilities also play a role; the Dimensity 9400’s Imagiq 890 ISP is likely to offer advanced image processing features. The OnePlus 12R, while capable, likely prioritizes a balanced camera experience rather than pushing the boundaries of mobile photography. The absence of information on sensor sizes and OIS makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the X200 Pro’s flagship status hints at a more advanced camera setup.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo X200 Pro features the Mediatek Dimensity 9400 built on a 3nm process, while the OnePlus 12R utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 on a 4nm process. The 3nm node of the Dimensity 9400 theoretically offers improved power efficiency and transistor density, potentially leading to higher sustained performance and reduced thermal throttling. The Dimensity 9400’s CPU configuration – a Cortex-X925 prime core – is a generation ahead of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s Cortex-X3, suggesting a performance uplift in single-core tasks. However, real-world performance will depend on software optimization and thermal management capabilities of each device.
Battery Life
The vivo X200 Pro achieves an active use battery score of 15:09h, slightly exceeding the OnePlus 12R’s 14:32h. This difference, while noticeable, isn’t massive. The OnePlus 12R compensates with significantly faster charging – 100W wired, capable of a full charge in 26 minutes – compared to the X200 Pro’s 90W wired charging. The X200 Pro also offers 30W wireless and reverse wireless/wired charging, adding versatility. The 12R’s faster wired charging is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X200 Pro if you demand the absolute latest in mobile processing power, a significantly brighter display for outdoor visibility, and are comfortable with a potentially less refined software experience. Buy the OnePlus 12R if you prioritize fast 100W charging, a more established and optimized OxygenOS software experience, and a slightly more affordable price point without sacrificing flagship-level performance.