vivo X200 Pro vs Honor Magic6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and sustained performance, the vivo X200 Pro edges out the Honor Magic6 Pro. Its Dimensity 9400 chipset, coupled with a slightly longer battery life, makes it the better choice for demanding tasks. However, the Magic6 Pro offers a compelling package with excellent charging speeds and a bright display.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X200 Pro | Honor Magic6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - China | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - India | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 14 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 19 | Available. Released 2024, January 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back or fiber-reinforced plastic back | Glass front (NanoCrystal Shield), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 76 x 8.2 mm or 8.5 mm | 162.5 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 223 g or 228 g (7.87 oz) | 225 g or 229 g (7.94 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Scratch/drop-resistant glass (Armor Glass) | NanoCrystal Shield |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 200 MP, f/2.7, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 2.7:1 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.4-2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 180 MP, f/2.6, (periscope telephoto), 1/1.49", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Log, Dolby Vision HDR | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR, 10-bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.93", 0.6µm, AF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired 30W wireless Reverse wireless Reverse wired | 80W wired 66W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | · Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh (Global)· Li-Ion 5200 mAh (Austria, Hungary, Germany) | Si/C Li-Ion 5600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmos Black, Titanium Grey, Blue, White | Black, Green, Blue, Purple, White |
| Models | V2413, V2405A, V2405DA | BVL-AN16, BVL-N49 |
| Price | £ 969.00 / ₹ 94,999 | € 455.54 / $ 899.00 / £ 598.99 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo X200 Pro
- Superior CPU performance with Dimensity 9400
- Longer battery life in active use
- Faster 90W wired charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- MediaTek chipset may have less software optimization
- Potential for higher price tag
Honor Magic6 Pro
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers excellent GPU performance
- Fast 80W wired and 66W wireless charging
- Established software ecosystem and support
- Potentially more competitive pricing
- Slightly shorter battery life
- Lower peak display brightness
Display Comparison
Both devices boast high-end displays, but the vivo X200 Pro takes a slight lead with a measured peak brightness of 1881 nits compared to the Honor Magic6 Pro’s 1578 nits. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, the X200 Pro’s higher brightness suggests a more advanced panel capable of wider dynamic range. The impact is most noticeable when viewing HDR content.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, both brands are known for their imaging prowess. The focus should be on sensor size and image processing algorithms. Given the flagship positioning, both devices likely feature large main sensors with optical image stabilization (OIS). The image processing style will be a key differentiator – vivo often leans towards vibrant, saturated colors, while Honor typically aims for more natural tones. The absence of information on secondary lenses makes it difficult to assess overall camera versatility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X200 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 9400, built on a 3nm process, features a unique CPU configuration with a Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.63 GHz, alongside three Cortex-X4 cores at 3.3 GHz and four Cortex-A720 cores at 2.4 GHz. This contrasts with the Honor Magic6 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) which utilizes a 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520 configuration. The Dimensity 9400’s X925 core is expected to deliver superior single-core performance, while the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized Adreno GPU. The 3nm node of the Dimensity 9400 should also provide better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The vivo X200 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving 15:09 hours of active use compared to the Honor Magic6 Pro’s 14:06 hours. While the Magic6 Pro compensates with faster 80W wired charging, the X200 Pro’s 90W wired charging is still very competitive. The X200 Pro also offers 30W wireless charging and reverse wireless/wired charging, providing greater flexibility. The combination of longer battery life and faster charging makes the X200 Pro the more convenient option for users who are frequently on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X200 Pro if you need uncompromising CPU performance for tasks like video editing, heavy multitasking, or demanding mobile games. Its focus on raw power and slightly superior battery life makes it ideal for power users. Buy the Honor Magic6 Pro if you prioritize fast charging, a vibrant display, and a more established software ecosystem, and are willing to trade a small amount of peak CPU performance.