vivo X200 Pro vs Google Pixel 8 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Android
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and battery endurance, the vivo X200 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9400 chipset and 15:09 active use battery life significantly outperform the Pixel 8 Pro. However, the Pixel 8 Pro remains a compelling choice for those deeply invested in Google’s software and camera capabilities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X200 Pro | Google Pixel 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - China | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - G1MNW |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - India | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G1MNW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 14 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 19 | Available. Released 2023, October 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, glass back or fiber-reinforced plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 76 x 8.2 mm or 8.5 mm | 162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 223 g or 228 g (7.87 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Scratch/drop-resistant glass (Armor Glass) | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) | 1344 x 2992 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~489 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Multi-zone Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 200 MP, f/2.7, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 2.7:1 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.0, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Log, Dolby Vision HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) | 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired 30W wireless Reverse wireless Reverse wired | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless Bypass charging |
| Type | · Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh (Global)· Li-Ion 5200 mAh (Austria, Hungary, Germany) | Li-Ion 5050 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmos Black, Titanium Grey, Blue, White | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Mint |
| Models | V2413, V2405A, V2405DA | GC3VE, G1MNW |
| Price | £ 969.00 / ₹ 94,999 | € 362.00 / $ 289.97 / £ 329.95 / ₹ 54,999 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo X200 Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 9400)
- Superior battery life (15:09h active use)
- Faster wired and wireless charging
- Higher peak display brightness
- Camera software likely less refined than Pixel
- Brand recognition lower than Google
Google Pixel 8 Pro
- Exceptional camera image processing and AI features
- Seamless Google software experience
- Strong ecosystem integration
- Reliable and consistent performance
- Slower processor (Tensor G3)
- Shorter battery life (11:14h active use)
- Slower charging speeds
Display Comparison
Both phones feature high-quality displays, but the vivo X200 Pro edges out the Pixel 8 Pro with a measured peak brightness of 1881 nits compared to the Pixel’s 1600 nits. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates (though not explicitly stated for the X200 Pro, it's a standard for this class), the X200 Pro’s higher brightness gives it a distinct advantage for outdoor use. Color accuracy is likely comparable, given both brands’ reputations, but the X200 Pro’s brightness provides a more vibrant viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 8 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s advanced image processing algorithms. While sensor sizes aren’t specified, the Pixel 8 Pro’s strength lies in its software – features like Magic Eraser and Best Take are deeply integrated. The X200 Pro’s camera capabilities are less detailed in the provided data, but vivo often focuses on hardware improvements. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Pixel 8 Pro’s established reputation for consistently excellent image quality, particularly in challenging conditions, gives it an edge. The Pixel 8 Pro’s video capabilities are also likely superior due to Google’s software optimizations.
Performance
The performance gap is significant. The vivo X200 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400, built on a 3nm process, boasts a core configuration of 1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925, 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720. This contrasts with the Pixel 8 Pro’s Google Tensor G3 (4nm) with its Nona-core setup of 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3, 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510. The Dimensity 9400’s newer architecture and higher clock speeds promise substantial gains in CPU and GPU performance. The 3nm node also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. While the Tensor G3 excels in AI-specific tasks, the Dimensity 9400 offers broader performance advantages.
Battery Life
Battery life is a clear win for the vivo X200 Pro. Its active use score of 15:09h significantly surpasses the Pixel 8 Pro’s 11:14h. While the Pixel 8 Pro’s older endurance rating of 90h is a useful metric, real-world active use is more indicative of daily performance. The X200 Pro also boasts faster charging with 90W wired, compared to the Pixel 8 Pro’s 30W wired (with PD3.0 and PPS, reaching 50% in 30 minutes). The X200 Pro further adds 30W wireless and reverse wireless/wired charging, offering greater versatility. The Pixel 8 Pro’s 23W wireless charging and bypass charging are useful, but don’t match the X200 Pro’s speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X200 Pro if you need uncompromising processing power for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value extended battery life for all-day use. Buy the Google Pixel 8 Pro if you prioritize a seamless software experience, exceptional camera image processing, and access to Google’s cutting-edge AI features, even if it means sacrificing some raw performance and battery longevity.