vivo X200 FE vs iQOO 12 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Value

vivo’s flagship strategy is bifurcated: the X-series focuses on a balanced experience, often prioritizing camera and design, while iQOO leans heavily into performance and gaming. The X200 FE, with its Dimensity 9300+, represents a compelling value proposition, but how does it stack up against the iQOO 12 Pro, powered by the latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3? This comparison dissects the key differences to help you choose the right device.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing raw performance and the fastest charging speeds, the iQOO 12 Pro is the clear winner. However, the vivo X200 FE offers a strong alternative with excellent processing power and impressive battery endurance, making it a compelling choice for those seeking a more balanced experience.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo X200 FE vivo iQOO 12 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66, 711, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2025, June 232023, November 07
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, July 05Available. Released 2023, November 14
Body
BuildGlass front, aluminum frame, glass back-
Dimensions150.8 x 71.8 x 8 mm (5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 in)164.6 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm or 8.8 mm
SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight186 g (6.56 oz)205 g or 210 g (7.23 oz)
Display
ProtectionSchott Xensation Core or Shield Glass, Mohs level 5-
Resolution1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~461 ppi density)1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density)
Size6.31 inches, 97.6 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeLTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 4500 / 5000 nits (peak)LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm)Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPUImmortalis-G720 MC12Adreno 750
OSAndroid 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 (International), OriginOS 4 (China)
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDRColor spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.7, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF (55cm - ∞), OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.0, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, ulti-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), AF
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single50 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF16 MP, f/2.5, (wide)
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 or 7 (market specific), dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging90W wired, 100% in 57 min Reverse wired120W wired 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless
TypeMarket-dependent versions:· Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5300 mAh (Austria only)5100 mAh
Misc
ColorsLuxe Grey (Black Luxe), Frost Blue (Blue Breeze), Amber Yellow (Yellow Glow), Pink VibeBlack, Red, White (BMW M branding)
ModelsV2503V2329A
Price€ 799.00 / $ 721.58 / ₹ 59,998About 650 EUR
SAR0.99 W/kg (head)     0.99 W/kg (body)-
EU LABEL
Battery58:09h endurance, 800 cycles-
EnergyClass B-
Free fallClass C (100 falls)-
RepairabilityClass C-

vivo X200 FE

  • Excellent battery endurance (58:09h)
  • Powerful Dimensity 9300+ processor
  • High peak display brightness (1758 nits)

  • Slower charging speed (90W wired)
  • No wireless charging

vivo iQOO 12 Pro

  • Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
  • 50W wireless charging
  • Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for peak performance

  • Potentially lower battery endurance compared to X200 FE
  • May run hotter under sustained load

Display Comparison

Both phones feature 4nm chipsets, but the display differences are notable. The vivo X200 FE boasts a peak brightness of 1758 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While panel technology details are missing, the X200 FE’s brightness suggests a high-quality AMOLED. The iQOO 12 Pro, lacking specific brightness data, likely offers a comparable experience, but the X200 FE has a measurable advantage in peak luminance. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, aligning with current flagship trends.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both phones are expected to feature capable camera systems. The iQOO 12 Pro, given its positioning, may prioritize video recording capabilities and advanced computational photography features. The X200 FE, traditionally, focuses on color science and natural image processing. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and OIS makes a definitive judgment impossible, but both are likely to offer competitive image quality in their respective price brackets.

Performance

The core battleground is the chipset. The iQOO 12 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (3.3 GHz Cortex-X4) is a powerhouse, but the vivo X200 FE’s Dimensity 9300+ (3.4 GHz Cortex-X4) isn’t far behind. The Dimensity’s unique CPU core configuration – one X4 at 3.4GHz and *three* additional X4 cores at 2.85GHz – suggests strong multi-core performance. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 utilizes a more traditional 1+3+2+2 configuration. Both utilize 4nm fabrication, but Qualcomm’s architecture is generally considered more efficient for sustained loads. The iQOO 12 Pro’s LPDDR5x RAM and optimized cooling system will likely provide a slight edge in prolonged gaming sessions.

Battery Life

The iQOO 12 Pro dominates in charging speed with 120W wired charging, achieving a full charge in a significantly shorter time than the X200 FE’s 90W charging (57 minutes to 100%). The addition of 50W wireless charging on the iQOO 12 Pro is a substantial advantage. While the X200 FE boasts impressive battery endurance with 58:09h, the iQOO 12 Pro’s faster charging mitigates any potential concerns about battery life. The X200 FE’s 800 cycle battery health suggests long-term reliability.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo X200 FE if you need a flagship-level processor for demanding tasks, value long battery life with 58:09h endurance, and appreciate a slightly more refined software experience. Buy the vivo iQOO 12 Pro if you prioritize ultimate gaming performance, require the fastest possible charging (120W wired and 50W wireless), and want a device specifically tuned for competitive mobile gaming.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Dimensity 9300+ in the X200 FE throttle under heavy gaming loads?
While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is known for its thermal efficiency, the Dimensity 9300+'s unique core configuration and 4nm process should provide excellent sustained performance. However, without dedicated thermal testing, it's difficult to definitively say if throttling will occur during extended gaming sessions. The X200 FE’s cooling solution will be a key factor.
❓ How does the 120W charging on the iQOO 12 Pro affect battery health long-term?
vivo employs intelligent charging algorithms to minimize battery degradation with its fast charging technologies. While faster charging *can* generate more heat, the iQOO 12 Pro’s charging system is designed to optimize the charging process and protect battery health over time. The X200 FE's 800 cycle rating suggests a focus on longevity.
❓ Is the difference in CPU core configuration between the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and Dimensity 9300+ noticeable in real-world use?
The Dimensity 9300+'s three mid-cores at 2.85GHz could provide a boost in multi-threaded tasks like video editing or content creation. However, for most everyday tasks and even many games, the difference will be minimal. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s optimized architecture and GPU will likely provide a more consistent experience across a wider range of applications.