vivo X200 FE vs Oppo Find X7: A Deep Dive into Mediatek's Flagship Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and sustained performance, the vivo X200 FE emerges as the winner. Its significantly superior 58:09 battery endurance, coupled with the slightly more powerful Dimensity 9300+, provides a more reliable all-day experience. While the Oppo Find X7 boasts faster charging, the X200 FE’s battery life offsets this advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X200 FE | Oppo Find X7 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 3, 4, 5 , 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 23 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 05 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 150.8 x 71.8 x 8 mm (5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) | 162.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm or 9.0 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 202 g or 206 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Core or Shield Glass, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~461 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.31 inches, 97.6 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 4500 / 5000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2300 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.7, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF (55cm - ∞), OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.0, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 3x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 or 7 (market specific), dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, 100% in 57 min Reverse wired | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5300 mAh (Austria only) | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Luxe Grey (Black Luxe), Frost Blue (Blue Breeze), Amber Yellow (Yellow Glow), Pink Vibe | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown, Purple |
| Models | V2503 | PHZ110 |
| Price | € 799.00 / $ 721.58 / ₹ 59,998 | About 520 EUR |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 58:09h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class C (100 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
vivo X200 FE
- Superior battery endurance (58:09h)
- More powerful Dimensity 9300+ chipset
- Longer battery lifespan (800 charge cycles)
- Slower charging speed (57 minutes to 100%)
- Camera specs unknown
Oppo Find X7
- Faster 100W charging (26 minutes to 100%)
- Potentially superior camera system (based on brand history)
- Convenient 50% charge in 10 minutes
- Lower battery endurance (data not provided, expected to be lower)
- Slightly less powerful Dimensity 9300 chipset
Display Comparison
The vivo X200 FE boasts a peak brightness of 1758 nits, a figure not provided for the Oppo Find X7, suggesting a potentially brighter outdoor viewing experience. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the X200 FE’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage in direct sunlight. Without further data on panel technology (LTPO, PWM dimming rate) for either device, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy or power efficiency beyond the peak brightness measurement.
Camera Comparison
Unfortunately, the provided data lacks camera specifications for either device. Given Oppo’s history with high-megapixel sensors and advanced image processing, the Find X7 likely features a more sophisticated camera system. However, without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a definitive comparison is impossible. We can assume both phones will offer capable cameras, but the Find X7 likely has an edge in image quality and features based on brand reputation.
Performance
Both phones are powered by Mediatek’s Dimensity 9300 series, but the vivo X200 FE features the Dimensity 9300+, clocked slightly higher with a 3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core compared to the Find X7’s 3.25 GHz Cortex-X4. This, combined with the additional 2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 cores on the X200 FE (3 vs 3), suggests a marginal performance edge in CPU-intensive tasks. Both utilize the same Cortex-A720 efficiency cores. The 4nm fabrication process is shared, meaning thermal management will likely depend more on the phone’s cooling solution, a detail not provided in the data.
Battery Life
The vivo X200 FE’s battery endurance of 58:09 hours significantly surpasses what we’d expect from a phone with a similar capacity to the Find X7 (capacity not provided). This suggests exceptional power efficiency optimization. While the Oppo Find X7 offers faster 100W charging (100% in 26 minutes) compared to the X200 FE’s 90W (100% in 57 minutes), the X200 FE’s longer endurance reduces the need for frequent top-ups. The Find X7’s 50% charge in 10 minutes is undeniably convenient, but the X200 FE’s 800 charge cycles indicate potentially longer battery lifespan.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X200 FE if you need exceptional battery life for demanding use cases like travel, content creation, or extended gaming sessions. Its 800 charge cycles also suggest greater long-term battery health. Buy the Oppo Find X7 if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging speeds and frequently top up your phone throughout the day, and value the convenience of reaching 100% in under 30 minutes.